From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/12] dax: add struct iomap based DAX PMD support Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 18:37:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20161003163754.GB1496@lst.de> References: <1475189370-31634-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <1475189370-31634-11-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20161003105949.GP6457@quack2.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ross Zwisler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , Alexander Viro , Andreas Dilger , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Dave Chinner , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161003105949.GP6457@quack2.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:59:49PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > I'm not quite sure if it is OK to call ->iomap_begin() without ever calling > ->iomap_end. Specifically the comment before iomap_apply() says: > > "It is assumed that the filesystems will lock whatever resources they > require in the iomap_begin call, and release them in the iomap_end call." > > so what you do could result in unbalanced allocations / locks / whatever. > Christoph? Indeed. For XFS we only rely on iomap_end for error handling at the moment, but it is intended to be paired for locking, as cluster file systems like gfs2 requested this. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org