From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] Revert "ext4: avoid deadlocks in the writeback path by using sb_getblk_gfp" Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:41:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20161216084126.GF26608@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20161215140715.12732-9-mhocko@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Dave Chinner , Theodore Ts'o , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Jan Kara , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, logfs@logfs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Michal Hocko To: Michal Hocko Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161215140715.12732-9-mhocko@kernel.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu 15-12-16 15:07:14, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > This reverts commit c45653c341f5c8a0ce19c8f0ad4678640849cb86 because > sb_getblk_gfp is not really needed as > sb_getblk > __getblk_gfp > __getblk_slow > grow_buffers > grow_dev_page > gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_constraint(inode->i_mapping, ~__GFP_FS) | gfp > > so __GFP_FS is cleared unconditionally and therefore the above commit > didn't have any real effect in fact. > > This patch should not introduce any functional change. The main point > of this change is to reduce explicit GFP_NOFS usage inside ext4 code to > make the review of the remaining usage easier. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Looks good to me. You can add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/ext4/extents.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c > index b1f8416923ab..ef815eb72389 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c > @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ __read_extent_tree_block(const char *function, unsigned int line, > struct buffer_head *bh; > int err; > > - bh = sb_getblk_gfp(inode->i_sb, pblk, __GFP_MOVABLE | GFP_NOFS); > + bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb, pblk); > if (unlikely(!bh)) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_split(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, > err = -EFSCORRUPTED; > goto cleanup; > } > - bh = sb_getblk_gfp(inode->i_sb, newblock, __GFP_MOVABLE | GFP_NOFS); > + bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb, newblock); > if (unlikely(!bh)) { > err = -ENOMEM; > goto cleanup; > @@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_grow_indepth(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, > if (newblock == 0) > return err; > > - bh = sb_getblk_gfp(inode->i_sb, newblock, __GFP_MOVABLE | GFP_NOFS); > + bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb, newblock); > if (unlikely(!bh)) > return -ENOMEM; > lock_buffer(bh); > -- > 2.10.2 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org