From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 v2] scope GFP_NOFS api Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:38:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20161222093828.GF6048@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Dave Chinner , Theodore Ts'o , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Jan Kara , ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, logfs-PCqxUs/MD9bYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-btrfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, reiserfs-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-ntfs-dev-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-f2fs-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-afs-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, LKML , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" To: linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Are there any objections to the approach and can we have this merged to the mm tree? Dave has expressed the patch2 should be dropped for now. I will do that in a next submission but I do not want to resubmit until there is a consensus on this. What do other than xfs/ext4 developers think about this API. Can we find a way to use it? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html