From: Roman Penyaev Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Find desired extent in ext4_ext_shift_extents() using binsearch Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:02:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170102125450.22807-1-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> <20170102125450.22807-4-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> <20170103144041.t5lmorkdqqljnwvl@thunk.org> <20170103221510.dkrxqav7qrq772ji@thunk.org> <20170104235818.v3fwchrjnxnhuble@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To: "Theodore Ts'o" , Roman Penyaev , Namjae Jeon , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170104235818.v3fwchrjnxnhuble@thunk.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > It looks like the original (before your patch) 1k failures due to a > bug introduced via the block.git tree, which has since been fixed in > Linus's mainline tree as of today. It wouldn't surprise me if the bug > interacted poorly your changes, so things will probably better with > your patches applied directly on top of the tip of Linus's tree. > > That being said, it looks like there were still regressions introduced > on the 4k configuration, so I'm in the middle of rerunning my baseline > and trying out your patches as well. It seems that some of the "finsert" tests from xfstests are broken by my patches. Now I am able to run all configurations with a kvm-xfstests help, so will take a look deeply. -- Roman