From: Anton Blanchard Subject: Re: ext4 filesystem corruption with 4.10-rc2 on ppc64le Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:44:10 +1100 Message-ID: <20170105214410.0fc5cd58@kryten> References: <20170104161808.5ad7b4fd@kryten> <6085340.JSrffQ0Szo@localhost.localdomain> <20170104152837.wdh7cdncs7gyged7@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jens Axboe , Stephen Rothwell , jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Chandan Rajendra , Paul Mackerras , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170104152837.wdh7cdncs7gyged7@thunk.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Hi Ted, > Anton or Chandan, could you do me a favor and verify whether or not > 64k block sizes are working for you on ppcle on ext4 by running > xfstests? Light duty testing works for me but when I stress ext4 with > pagesize==blocksize on ppcle64 via xfstests, it blows up. I suspect > (but am not sure) it's due to (non-upstream) device driver issues, and > a verification that you can run xfstests on your ppcle64 systems using > standard upstream device drivers would be very helpful, since I don't > have easy console access on the machines I have access to at > $WORK. :-( I fired off an xfstests run, and it looks good. There are 3 failures, but they seem to be setup issues on my part. I also double checked those same three failed on 4.8. Chandan has been running the test suite regularly, and plans to do a run against mainline too. Anton