From: Eric Biggers Subject: Re: Refreshed rootfs.img for kvm-xfstests Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:50:33 -0800 Message-ID: <20170110185033.GA58743@gmail.com> References: <20170109231450.objek3yirxbtbgzn@thunk.org> <20170110033845.qkjg6qzfjxy5i54k@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Theodore Ts'o , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers To: Roman Penyaev Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:33128 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S940227AbdAJSug (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:50:36 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f195.google.com with SMTP id 127so30103529pfg.0 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:50:36 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote: > > I retested the following configurations on 69973b830859 ("Linux 4.9"): > > ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c nojournal ext4/301 > ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c ext3conv generic/347 > ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c adv generic/396 generic/399 > ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c data_journal generic/347 > ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c bigalloc generic/399 > ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c bigalloc_1k generic/273 > > all of the tests from list have failed. > > This is not very much helpful, but at least that can be a starting > point for bisecting. > > When there was a successful xfstests run at least for some of > the configurations? Would be nice to have a "good" reference. > Hi Roman, Generally these have been broken for a while, or in the case of generic/396 and generic/399 are new tests which are exposing bugs. A few of these I was already aware of but just haven't had time to get to: - the failure of generic/347 in data journalling mode is intermittent - the failure of generic/396 in "adv" mode is related to the use of the inline data feature, apparently caused by ext4_convert_inline_data() corrupting an empty directory - failure of generic/399 in some configurations If you're interested in looking into any of these failing tests and either fixing the kernel or fixing the test as appropriate, please feel free to! Thanks, Eric