From: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: ext3/ext4: increase the protection of nlink dec and
 inode destroy
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:40:40 +0800
Message-ID: <c86cc7fa-c1bb-9c2d-d775-9f93587a324c@huawei.com>
References: <1486384513-34971-1-git-send-email-yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
        <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1486384513-34971-1-git-send-email-yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org

please ignore this, sorry.

on 2017/2/6 20:35, yi zhang said:
> From: zhangyi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> 
> Because of the disk and hardware issue, the ext3/4 filesystem have
> many errors, the inode->i_nlink of ext3/4 becomes zero abnormally
> but the dentry is still positive, it will cause memory corruption
> after the following process:
> 
>  1) Due to the inode->i_nlink is 0, this inode will be added into
> the orhpan list,
>  2) ext4_rename() and ext3_rename() cover this inode, and drop_nlink() 
> will reverse the inode->i_nlink to 0xFFFFFFFF,
>  3) iput() add this inode to LRU,
>  4) evict() will call destroy_inode() to destroy this inode but
> skip removing it from the orphan list,
>  5) after this, the inode's memory address space will be used by
> other module, when the ext3/4 filesystem change the orphan list, it will
> trample other module's data and then may cause oops.
> 
> Although we cannot avoid hardware and disk errors, we can control the
> softwore error in the ext3/4 module, do not affect other modules and
> increase the difficulty of locating problems.
> 
> This patch avoid inode->i_nlink underflow and remove the inode from the
> orphan list when destroy it if the list is not empty.
> 
> Signed-off-by: zhangyi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext3/namei.c | 6 ++++++
>  fs/ext3/super.c | 1 +
>  fs/ext4/namei.c | 6 ++++++
>  fs/ext4/super.c | 1 +
>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/namei.c b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> index 4264b9b..a2d5b34 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> @@ -2500,6 +2500,12 @@ static int ext3_rename (struct inode * old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (new_inode) {
> +		if (!new_inode->i_nlink) {
> +			ext3_warning (new_inode->i_sb, "ext3_rename",
> +				"Removing nonexistent file (%lu), %d",
> +				new_inode->i_ino, new_inode->i_nlink);
> +			set_nlink(new_inode, 1);
> +		}
>  		drop_nlink(new_inode);
>  		new_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
>  	}
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c
> index c2870e5..90985f7 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/super.c
> @@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ static void ext3_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
>  				EXT3_I(inode), sizeof(struct ext3_inode_info),
>  				false);
>  		dump_stack();
> +		ext3_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
>  	}
>  	call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, ext3_i_callback);
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index 03482c01..9852b24 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -3697,6 +3697,12 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (new.inode) {
> +		if (new.inode->i_nlink == 0) {
> +			ext4_warning(new.inode->i_sb,
> +				"Removing nonexistent file (%lu), %d",
> +				new.inode->i_ino, new.inode->i_nlink);
> +			set_nlink(new.inode, 1);
> +		}
>  		ext4_dec_count(handle, new.inode);
>  		new.inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(new.inode);
>  	}
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 700d520..2772a53 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -934,6 +934,7 @@ static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
>  				EXT4_I(inode), sizeof(struct ext4_inode_info),
>  				true);
>  		dump_stack();
> +		ext4_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
>  	}
>  	call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, ext4_i_callback);
>  }
>