From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: replace FAULT_FLAG_SIZE with parameter to huge_fault Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:27:31 -0800 Message-ID: <20170206172731.GA17515@infradead.org> References: <148615748258.43180.1690152053774975329.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com> <20170206143648.GA461@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Matthew Wilcox , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , Dave Hansen , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux MM , Vlastimil Babka , Jan Kara , Andrew Morton , linux-ext4 , "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Dan Williams Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:52659 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750953AbdBFR1e (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:27:34 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:24:48AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > Also can be use this opportunity > > to fold ->huge_fault into ->fault? > > Hmm, yes, just need a scheme to not attempt huge_faults on pte-only handlers. Do we need anything more than checking vma->vm_flags for VM_HUGETLB?