From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:51:58 -0800 Message-ID: <20170308155158.GB4353@infradead.org> References: <20170228233610.25456-1-rgoldwyn@suse.de> <20170228233610.25456-6-rgoldwyn@suse.de> <0d1ba678-69c0-16ce-6c3e-475cd8da203c@grimberg.me> <44cc02b1-f7ac-cbc6-6f09-726ae8225358@suse.de> <20170308152806.GA9288@quack2.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues , Sagi Grimberg , jack@suse.com, hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Goldwyn Rodrigues To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:43557 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750778AbdCHPwH (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:52:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170308152806.GA9288@quack2.suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:28:06PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Well, that's not really good. If we cannot support this for both blk-mq and > legacy block layer the feature will not be usable. So please work on blk-mq > support as well. Exactly. In addition to that anything implementing a feature for the legacy request request code but not blk-mq is grounds for an instant NAK.