From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/30] fs: inode->i_version rework and optimization Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 06:45:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20170321134500.GA1318@infradead.org> References: <1482339827-7882-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <20161222084549.GA8833@infradead.org> <1482417724.3924.39.camel@redhat.com> <20170320214327.GA5098@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Layton , Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:41619 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756497AbdCUNpC (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:45:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170320214327.GA5098@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:43:27PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > To me, the interesting question is whether this allows us to turn on > i_version updates by default on xfs and ext4. XFS v5 file systems have it on by default. Although we'll still need to agree on the exact semantics of i_version before it's going to be useful.