From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mm: add vm_insert_mixed_mkwrite() Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:16:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20170719141659.GB15908@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20170628220152.28161-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20170628220152.28161-2-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J. Wong" , Theodore Ts'o , Alexander Viro , Andreas Dilger , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , Jan Kara , Jonathan Corbet , Matthew Wilcox , Steven Rostedt , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org To: Ross Zwisler Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170628220152.28161-2-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed 28-06-17 16:01:48, Ross Zwisler wrote: > To be able to use the common 4k zero page in DAX we need to have our PTE > fault path look more like our PMD fault path where a PTE entry can be > marked as dirty and writeable as it is first inserted, rather than waiting > for a follow-up dax_pfn_mkwrite() => finish_mkwrite_fault() call. > > Right now we can rely on having a dax_pfn_mkwrite() call because we can > distinguish between these two cases in do_wp_page(): > > case 1: 4k zero page => writable DAX storage > case 2: read-only DAX storage => writeable DAX storage > > This distinction is made by via vm_normal_page(). vm_normal_page() returns > false for the common 4k zero page, though, just as it does for DAX ptes. > Instead of special casing the DAX + 4k zero page case, we will simplify our > DAX PTE page fault sequence so that it matches our DAX PMD sequence, and > get rid of dax_pfn_mkwrite() completely. > > This means that insert_pfn() needs to follow the lead of insert_pfn_pmd() > and allow us to pass in a 'mkwrite' flag. If 'mkwrite' is set insert_pfn() > will do the work that was previously done by wp_page_reuse() as part of the > dax_pfn_mkwrite() call path. > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler Just one small comment below. > @@ -1658,14 +1658,26 @@ static int insert_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, > if (!pte) > goto out; > retval = -EBUSY; > - if (!pte_none(*pte)) > - goto out_unlock; > + if (!pte_none(*pte)) { > + if (mkwrite) { > + entry = *pte; > + goto out_mkwrite; Can we maybe check here that (pte_pfn(*pte) == pfn_t_to_pfn(pfn)) and return -EBUSY otherwise? That way we are sure insert_pfn() isn't doing anything we don't expect and if I understand the code right, we need to invalidate all zero page mappings at given file offset (via unmap_mapping_range()) before mapping an allocated block there and thus the case of filling the hole won't be affected by this? Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org