From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] dax, iomap: Add support for synchronous faults Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 03:56:08 -0700 Message-ID: <20170801105608.GD6742@infradead.org> References: <20170727131245.28279-1-jack@suse.cz> <20170727131245.28279-6-jack@suse.cz> <20170727224245.GF22000@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ross Zwisler , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Dan Williams , Andy Lutomirski , linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170727224245.GF22000-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:42:45PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > I wonder if we should name this flag something a little stronger and more > specific to its usage with respect to DAX and sync faults? Maybe > "VM_FAULT_NEEDDSYNC" for consistency with the iomap flag? Agreed.