From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] ext4: Support for synchronous DAX faults Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:36:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20170824123615.GB6187@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20170817160815.30466-1-jack@suse.cz> <20170817160815.30466-14-jack@suse.cz> <20170824123126.GA21282@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Andy Lutomirski , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Ross Zwisler , Dan Williams , Boaz Harrosh To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170824123126.GA21282@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu 24-08-17 05:31:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 06:08:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > We return IOMAP_F_NEEDDSYNC flag from ext4_iomap_begin() for a > > synchronous write fault when inode has some uncommitted metadata > > changes. In the fault handler ext4_dax_fault() we then detect this case, > > call vfs_fsync_range() to make sure all metadata is committed, and call > > dax_pfn_mkwrite() to mark PTE as writeable. Note that this will also > > dirty corresponding radix tree entry which is what we want - fsync(2) > > will still provide data integrity guarantees for applications not using > > userspace flushing. And applications using userspace flushing can avoid > > calling fsync(2) and thus avoid the performance overhead. > > Why is this only wiered up for the huge_fault handler and not the > regular? We do handle both. Just ext4 naming is a bit confusing and ext4_dax_fault() uses ext4_dax_huge_fault() for handling. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR