From: Reindl Harald Subject: Re: regression: 4.13 cannot follow symlinks on some ext3 fs Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 23:45:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20171123203330.GN2482@two.firstfloor.org> <20171123222317.bq2v26zm5i2jspui@thunk.org> <20171123233101.GP2482@two.firstfloor.org> <700971AC-BDE2-4993-BD56-7497AD8A0FC4@dilger.ca> <20171124020435.GQ2482@two.firstfloor.org> <20171124165102.GS2482@two.firstfloor.org> <706E8F37-95C7-4321-AACA-2ED11F82E625@dilger.ca> <20171125223202.GL4094@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andi Kleen , Theodore Ts'o , Tahsin Erdogan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 To: Dave Chinner , Andreas Dilger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171125223202.GL4094@dastard> Content-Language: de-CH Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Am 25.11.2017 um 23:32 schrieb Dave Chinner: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:03:37PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: >> Any worse an idea than running a new kernel on an old system? >> Newer e2fsck fixes a lot of bugs that are present in older >> e2fsck as well... > > I'm running with everything up to date (debian unstable) on these > VMs, they are just an old filesystem because some distros have had > reliable rolling updates for the entire life of these VMs. :P but why not update the FS to ext4? our whole infrastructure was installed with Fedora 9 on ext3 (currently running F26, yum/dnf dist-upgrades) but any FS including the rootfs was converted to ext4 in 2010