From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: Testing Ext4 encryption with fstests Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:22:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20171203062210.GA2775@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <2008991.n3x73QCyP8@localhost.localdomain> <20171203024449.foyydafswblqceou@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chandan Rajendra , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:45156 "EHLO mail-pg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752092AbdLCGWS (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2017 01:22:18 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m25so6220572pgv.12 for ; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 22:22:18 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171203024449.foyydafswblqceou@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Ted, On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 09:44:49PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 08:44:29AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote: ... > > generic/466 and generic/468 are new tests that are failing on the > standard 4k config as well as the encrypt case. On my todo list to > look at more closely and triage. I've sent a patch to fix generic/468 failure on Nov. 15th, would you please take a look and review it? ext4: fix fdatasync(2) after fallocate(2) operation https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/838141/ Thanks, Eryu