From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: simplify procfs code for seq_file instances
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:57:50 +0300
Message-ID: <20180419185750.GD2066@avx2>
References: <20180419124140.9309-1-hch@lst.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
        linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
        netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180419124140.9309-1-hch@lst.de>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org

>     git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git proc_create


I want to ask if it is time to start using poorman function overloading
with _b_c_e(). There are millions of allocation functions for example,
all slightly difference, and people will add more. Seeing /proc interfaces
doubled like this is painful.