From: Finn Thain Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/40] proc: introduce proc_create_single{,_data} Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:45:50 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: References: <20180425154827.32251-1-hch@lst.de> <20180425154827.32251-7-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180425154827.32251-7-hch@lst.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > -/* > - * /proc/nubus stuff > - */ > - I don't think that the introduction of proc_create_single{,_data} alters the value of that comment. That comment and similar comments in the same file do have a purpose, which is to keep separate the /proc/nubus implementation is kept separate from the /proc/bus/nubus/devices implementation and so on. --