From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] vgem: separate errno from VM_FAULT_* values Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 06:13:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20180516131304.GF20670@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20180516054348.15950-1-hch@lst.de> <20180516054348.15950-11-hch@lst.de> <20180516095303.GH3438@phenom.ffwll.local> <20180516130159.GA32454@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Souptick Joarder , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@lists.orangefs.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180516130159.GA32454@lst.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:01:59PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:53:03AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter > > > > Want me to merge this through drm-misc or plan to pick it up yourself? > > For now I just want a honest discussion if people really actually > want the vm_fault_t change with the whole picture in place. That discussion already happened on the -mm mailing list. And again at LSFMM. Both times the answer was yes.