From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: Sphinx version dependencies? Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:10:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20180720171020.GI4800@magnolia> References: <20180719181556.GA21435@thunk.org> <20180719190400.GB4800@magnolia> <44d73cd9926f58976a1269ff3cd3afb845ec84fa.camel@darmarit.de> <20180720131206.GM30706@thunk.org> <20180720145235.GA27862@thunk.org> <20180720164421.GG4800@magnolia> <93aa59853a491a5ba3d5c3bcc0c991a1b815a67d.camel@darmarit.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Markus Heiser Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93aa59853a491a5ba3d5c3bcc0c991a1b815a67d.camel@darmarit.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 06:58:57PM +0200, Markus Heiser wrote: > Am Freitag, den 20.07.2018, 09:44 -0700 schrieb Darrick J. Wong: > > and now I'm just confused since 16.04 has the same version of docutils > > and an older sphinx and runs fine; but 18.04 has newer docutils and > > newer sphinx and runs fine. > > Same here .. I'am completely confused by distros etc. .. I will never be able to > control that. Thats why I recommend the virtualenv workflow (as I wrote Christoph): Well yes, but it's the virtualenv workflow that produced build errors for Ted; that's what would seem to need fixing? --D > $ sudo apt install python3-virtualenv > > To setup up a environment for building htmldocs: > > $ python3 -m virtualenv py3env > $ ./py3env/bin/pip install -r ./Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt > > To build htmldocs with: > > $ SPHINXBUILD=./py3env/bin/sphinx-build make htmldocs > > If the env is no longer needed: > > $ rm -r py3env > > Am Freitag, den 20.07.2018, 09:44 -0700 schrieb Darrick J. Wong: > > Yes. This makes writing broadly portable markup difficult -- originally > > I did not take the '=' all the way to the right edge of the table > > because I saw that last example in the above document and assumed that > > it wasn't necessary to extend the '=' all the way to the right edge. > > Neither Ubuntu system choked on it, so is this a bug in upstream? Some > > strange patch added by the distro? Something that ended up in the > > python wheel? Or a bug in the spec? > > I guess in the version history of docutils ;) .. use workflow above to escape > from distro chaos. Even missing '=' will be OK. > > -- Markus --