Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f195.google.com ([209.85.214.195]:46848 "EHLO mail-pl1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728228AbeJCEB6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:01:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f195.google.com with SMTP id v5-v6so2341370plz.13 for ; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:16:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181003071059.02b3fd6f@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20181003071059.02b3fd6f@canb.auug.org.au> From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:16:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL linux-next] Add Compiler Attributes tree To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Andrew Morton , Greg KH , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , rostedt@goodmis.org, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, olof@lxom.net, Konstantin Ryabitsev , "David S. Miller" , Andrey Ryabinin , Kees Cook , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Paul Lawrence , sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Andrey Konovalov , David Woodhouse , Will Deacon , Philippe Ombredanne , paul.burton@mips.com, David Rientjes , Willy Tarreau , msebor@gmail.com, sparse@chrisli.org, Jonathan Corbet , "Theodore Ts'o" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Rasmus Villemoes , joe@perches.com, Arnd Bergmann , asmadeus@codewreck.org, Stefan Agner , Luc Van Oostenryck , Linus Torvalds , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kbuild mailing list , LKML , sfr@canb.auug.org.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:11 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Miguel, > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 15:47:12 +0200 Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > > > The Compiler Attributes series has been stable for 10+ days. To > > increase testing before 4.20, I would to request it being picked up > > for -next. > > > > The changes w.r.t. v5 in the LKML: > > > > - Rebased on top of next-20180928, which required removing > > Unfortunately, trees/branches included in linux-next must be based on > something stable (usually Linus' tree, but it could be another > tree/branch that is included in linux-next that does not rebase). > Linux-next itself rebases every day, so snything based on it would drag > in a previous version of all the other trees :-( I think of this like a branch that's force pushed to. Can't base other branches or trees off of it cause it's always moving/force rewriting history. > > > aligned_largest, which was removed by 9503cd9cbaba > > ("include/linux/compiler*.h: add version detection to > > asm_volatile_goto"). > > That commit is from Andrew's patch series which also rebases (usually > at least every week), so you cannot depend on it. Miguel, you should be able to drop that patch from your set then, since Andrew's -mm tree flows into this -next tree as well, IIUC. We'll take up that patch from there. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers