Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:58914 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726946AbeK2Vne (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:43:34 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wATAcaXD036437 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 05:38:39 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2p2cswn0dy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 05:38:38 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:38:33 -0000 From: Chandan Rajendra To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Jaegeuk Kim , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ebiggers@kernel.org Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/7] f2fs: use IS_ENCRYPTED() to check encryption status Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:08:31 +0530 In-Reply-To: <20181126173435.GA22888@thunk.org> References: <20181119052324.31456-1-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20181126040038.GD7904@thunk.org> <20181126173435.GA22888@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <2911123.OYxvaggYeN@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday, November 26, 2018 11:04:35 PM IST Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:00:38PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > > > It might be that the simplest way to solve things is to merge the f2fs > > dev branch up to 79c66e75720c. This will have the net effect of > > including the five patches listed above onto the fscrypt git tree. So > > long you don't plan to rebase or otherwise change these five patches, > > it should avoid any merge conflicts. > > I've set up a git branch which has the f2fs dev branch, 4.20-rc4, the > fsverity patches, and part of Chandan's patch series here: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/fscrypt.git test-working > > There is a minor conflict when I did a trial merge with f2fs.git's dev > branch, but it's pretty obvious to how to resolve it. > > Jaegeuk, Eric, Chandan, please take a look and let me know what you > think. Ted, I have addressed the review comments provided by Eric. Hence three out of the four patches in the test-working branch have new changes. I also got UBIFS to use CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION instead of the per-filesystem config symbol. I am currently executing fstests to verify the changes. Eric, When executing generic/900, I noticed that sometimes xfs_io would get stuck for an indefinite period. /proc//stack showed that the task was stuck in tty_read() inside the kernel. The following change fixed it, diff --git a/tests/generic/900 b/tests/generic/900 index 290889ce..0831eed4 100755 --- a/tests/generic/900 +++ b/tests/generic/900 @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ _fsv_create_enable_file $fsv_file >> $seqres.full echo "* reading" $XFS_IO_PROG -r $fsv_file -c '' echo "* xfs_io writing, should be O_RDWR" -$XFS_IO_PROG $fsv_file |& _filter_scratch +$XFS_IO_PROG -c '' $fsv_file 2>&1 | _filter_scratch echo "* bash >>, should be O_APPEND" bash -c "echo >> $fsv_file" |& _filter_scratch echo "* bash >, should be O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC" xfs_io gets into interactive mode when invoked without a "-c cmd" string. However, I am not able recreate the scenario once again without the above changes applied. I am not sure about what changed. -- chandan