Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59110 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726091AbeKZNMw (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:12:52 -0500 From: Ming Lei To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Theodore Ts'o , Omar Sandoval , Sagi Grimberg , Dave Chinner , Kent Overstreet , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J . Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Gao Xiang , Christoph Hellwig , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Boaz Harrosh , Bob Peterson , cluster-devel@redhat.com, Ming Lei Subject: [PATCH V12 13/20] block: loop: pass multi-page bvec to iov_iter Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:17:13 +0800 Message-Id: <20181126021720.19471-14-ming.lei@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20181126021720.19471-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> References: <20181126021720.19471-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: iov_iter is implemented on bvec itererator helpers, so it is safe to pass multi-page bvec to it, and this way is much more efficient than passing one page in each bvec. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Ming Lei --- drivers/block/loop.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c index 176ab1f28eca..e3683211f12d 100644 --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -510,21 +510,22 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd, loff_t pos, bool rw) { struct iov_iter iter; + struct req_iterator rq_iter; struct bio_vec *bvec; struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd); struct bio *bio = rq->bio; struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; + struct bio_vec tmp; unsigned int offset; - int segments = 0; + int nr_bvec = 0; int ret; + rq_for_each_bvec(tmp, rq, rq_iter) + nr_bvec++; + if (rq->bio != rq->biotail) { - struct req_iterator iter; - struct bio_vec tmp; - __rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) - segments += bio_segments(bio); - bvec = kmalloc_array(segments, sizeof(struct bio_vec), + bvec = kmalloc_array(nr_bvec, sizeof(struct bio_vec), GFP_NOIO); if (!bvec) return -EIO; @@ -533,10 +534,10 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd, /* * The bios of the request may be started from the middle of * the 'bvec' because of bio splitting, so we can't directly - * copy bio->bi_iov_vec to new bvec. The rq_for_each_segment + * copy bio->bi_iov_vec to new bvec. The rq_for_each_bvec * API will take care of all details for us. */ - rq_for_each_segment(tmp, rq, iter) { + rq_for_each_bvec(tmp, rq, rq_iter) { *bvec = tmp; bvec++; } @@ -550,11 +551,10 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd, */ offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done; bvec = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter); - segments = bio_segments(bio); } atomic_set(&cmd->ref, 2); - iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw, bvec, segments, blk_rq_bytes(rq)); + iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw, bvec, nr_bvec, blk_rq_bytes(rq)); iter.iov_offset = offset; cmd->iocb.ki_pos = pos; -- 2.9.5