Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34656 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728289AbeKVCYI (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:24:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:48:13 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Theodore Ts'o , Omar Sandoval , Sagi Grimberg , Dave Chinner , Kent Overstreet , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J . Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Gao Xiang , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Boaz Harrosh , Bob Peterson , cluster-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 15/19] block: enable multipage bvecs Message-ID: <20181121154812.GD19111@ming.t460p> References: <20181121032327.8434-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20181121032327.8434-16-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20181121145502.GA3241@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181121145502.GA3241@lst.de> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:55:02PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:23:23AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > if (bio->bi_vcnt > 0) { > > - struct bio_vec *bv = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1]; > > + struct bio_vec bv; > > + struct bio_vec *seg = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1]; > > > > - if (page == bv->bv_page && off == bv->bv_offset + bv->bv_len) { > > - bv->bv_len += len; > > + bvec_last_segment(seg, &bv); > > + > > + if (page == bv.bv_page && off == bv.bv_offset + bv.bv_len) { > > I think this we can simplify the try to merge into bio case a bit, > and also document it better with something like this: > > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c > index 854676edc438..cc913281a723 100644 > --- a/block/bio.c > +++ b/block/bio.c > @@ -822,54 +822,40 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_pc_page); > * @page: page to add > * @len: length of the data to add > * @off: offset of the data in @page > + * @same_page: if %true only merge if the new data is in the same physical > + * page as the last segment of the bio. > * > - * Try to add the data at @page + @off to the last page of @bio. This is a > + * Try to add the data at @page + @off to the last bvec of @bio. This is a > * a useful optimisation for file systems with a block size smaller than the > * page size. > * > * Return %true on success or %false on failure. > */ > bool __bio_try_merge_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, > - unsigned int len, unsigned int off) > + unsigned int len, unsigned int off, bool same_page) > { > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED))) > return false; > > if (bio->bi_vcnt > 0) { > - struct bio_vec bv; > - struct bio_vec *seg = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1]; > - > - bvec_last_segment(seg, &bv); > - > - if (page == bv.bv_page && off == bv.bv_offset + bv.bv_len) { > - seg->bv_len += len; > - bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len; > - return true; > - } > + struct bio_vec *bv = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1]; > + phys_addr_t vec_addr = page_to_phys(bv->bv_page); > + phys_addr_t page_addr = page_to_phys(page); > + > + if (vec_addr + bv->bv_offset + bv->bv_len != page_addr + off) > + return false; > + if (same_page && > + (vec_addr & PAGE_SIZE) != (page_addr & PAGE_SIZE)) > + return false; I guess the correct check should be: end_addr = vec_addr + bv->bv_offset + bv->bv_len; if (same_page && (end_addr & PAGE_MASK) != (page_addr & PAGE_MASK)) return false; And this approach is good, will take it in V12. Thanks, Ming