Return-Path: Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:48004 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728679AbfAOMqO (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:46:14 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 442FF77D4041247AAAD9 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:46:12 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: add check for blocksize in ext2_fill_super To: Jan Kara CC: , , , References: <20190110053145.138518-1-yangerkun@huawei.com> From: yangerkun Message-ID: <422fbc79-12a1-62d4-ee4a-0bc9b652cd89@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:46:01 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190110053145.138518-1-yangerkun@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jan Kara, Could you please help me to check this patch? Besides, i have notice that EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE has never been used before. So there maybe someone using ext2fs which blocksize exceed EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE in the os that page size exceed 4K? And if it's true, this patch will lead to a unused ext2fs. Also, we can fix the problem by modify ext2_max_size, but it's difficult to get the accurate result, it may not a good idea too... Thanks a lot, Kun. yangerkun wrote on 2019/1/10 13:31: > While mkfs with '-b 65536' and then mount this fs with arm 64KB page > size, function mount_fs will trigger WARNING because that ext2_max_size > will return value less than 0. Also, we cannot write any file in this > fs since the sb->s_maxbytes is less than 0. Avoid this by check blocksize > in ext2_fill_super like ext4_fill_super. > > Signed-off-by: yangerkun > --- > fs/ext2/ext2.h | 1 + > fs/ext2/super.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ext2/ext2.h b/fs/ext2/ext2.h > index e770cd1..ba95316 100644 > --- a/fs/ext2/ext2.h > +++ b/fs/ext2/ext2.h > @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ static inline struct ext2_sb_info *EXT2_SB(struct super_block *sb) > #define EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE 1024 > #define EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE 4096 > #define EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE 10 > +#define EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE 12 > #define EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE(s) ((s)->s_blocksize) > #define EXT2_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(s) (EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE(s) / sizeof (__u32)) > #define EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS(s) ((s)->s_blocksize_bits) > diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c > index 73b2d52..029945e 100644 > --- a/fs/ext2/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c > @@ -960,6 +960,21 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > } > > blocksize = BLOCK_SIZE << le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_log_block_size); > + if (blocksize < EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE || > + blocksize > EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE) { > + ext2_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, > + "Unsupported filesystem blocksize %d (%d log_block_size)", > + blocksize, le32_to_cpu(es->s_log_block_size)); > + goto failed_mount; > + } > + > + if (le32_to_cpu(es->s_log_block_size) > > + (EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE - EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE)) { > + ext2_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, > + "Invalid log block size: %u", > + le32_to_cpu(es->s_log_block_size)); > + goto failed_mount; > + } > > if (sbi->s_mount_opt & EXT2_MOUNT_DAX) { > if (!bdev_dax_supported(sb->s_bdev, blocksize)) { >