Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D45C43381 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5721E2084F for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726157AbfBUNbm (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:31:42 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:46268 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725920AbfBUNbm (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:31:42 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1LDUtjP093964 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:31:41 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qsuq3b8mn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:31:40 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:39 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:35 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x1LDVYx226148904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:34 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21794205E; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2C54204C; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.75.223]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Chandan Rajendra To: Eric Biggers Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Consolidate Post read processing code Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:02:03 +0530 Organization: IBM In-Reply-To: <20190220004107.GI12177@gmail.com> References: <20190218100433.20048-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com> <20190220004107.GI12177@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19022113-0008-0000-0000-000002C335A1 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19022113-0009-0000-0000-0000222F70BD Message-Id: <2420837.hecoV8S9Z6@localhost.localdomain> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-21_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=943 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902210099 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:11:07 AM IST Eric Biggers wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 03:34:23PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > > Based on the reviews provided for this patchset, I > > will change F2FS to use mpage_readpage[s] and post the next version of > > this patchset to linux-fsdevel mailing list. > > Is that really possible? F2FS has other functionality in its ->readpages(), > such as support for filesystems that use multiple block devices. > Hmm. I didn't know that. Thanks for pointing that out. I will read up that code and if it isn't really possible to get F2FS to use mpage_readpage[s](), then I would limit the patchset to Ext4. -- chandan