Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp7417383yba; Thu, 2 May 2019 09:28:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwqCOZL6KsFIW9jGK2BElulYJdYui2jLRJ4D9NawtNHcPpjHBIEMmr1rrXhvcV40tBnKZVZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bc85:: with SMTP id bb5mr4724543plb.310.1556814484214; Thu, 02 May 2019 09:28:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556814484; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IZ4D9bgskg9G4dOIaF974VSPvTsWry7hfSvbDjQpPLqh7YXlHEM52SySh/vZLGY7k0 kpB2M3MsVJuGN/oRR6OA03Yq6khml2pKn3IOd0w4+RS9Oicb35VRBwLWP886UBRW+bgF V0g1Wjeg2zwYPy2a9hRdvvTonKAz0Jnh2xORH3fVc0QcxqYhpbWtzbhVP13Rf4dgV8tm 2UvzkuyZ8zeY9hysc/8/RPHZ0gr/Q3TS0VMBfQJCAhNVdA4CYp2zc9XLJ6Hk4QkAAkgl YedHxZjR5+B3zvAyM7Y1GKxgHFfiGyZfh1Q6sQsOR/wxpj1IuGnPEYAmInu78WbUpnyP 2fgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=DgySpMqsqkWSzzqS/dJYWbvbY/Y2HqdSMeiaOyehQ+w=; b=CpGFPoZ6WPQGBqe74KiVusXwixCj9CEp+utm4ZMO2kchfsVuFDvXLQy7Ni9MZQ1Cfe 8Liq46NBhj+WzNgpRxBw395apfjJQLfO+ADQAPu6fMj+IqEIXiLAOcFoCWa2jFml79DQ +iD2ByBPtM1p5FPwOuAwNE79SIYnijFRrLYs5Yk+rFZONsmj+ui+xB5EdpZCVnS6M7YT PRyPnQK3a3G8FW+mjLErnuz0dsP1BIdOdW7h0XgSbZUxtE1DN0vDpyHBILlNoii3dhb2 tgXVG1vIOE6Kg8PWkeQnFsuATbf56xIE3V1Sxemboy+RvkYegamw+tKJLzTRDlveOe+l KxGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u6si1613601pgr.12.2019.05.02.09.27.42; Thu, 02 May 2019 09:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726435AbfEBQZe (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 May 2019 12:25:34 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:57793 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726381AbfEBQZe (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2019 12:25:34 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (adsl-173-228-226-134.prtc.net [173.228.226.134]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x42GPRZB027151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 2 May 2019 12:25:29 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 76992420024; Thu, 2 May 2019 12:25:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 12:25:27 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Change feature name from fname_encoding to casefold? Message-ID: <20190502162527.GC25007@mit.edu> References: <20190413054317.7388-1-krisman@collabora.com> <20190413054317.7388-9-krisman@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190413054317.7388-9-krisman@collabora.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Given how we've simplified how we handle Unicode --- in particular, not doing any kind of normalization unless we are doing case-folding compares, I think it will be more user-friendly if we rename the feature from fname_encoding to casefold. What do you think? Any objections? - Ted