Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] ext4: encrypt only up to last block in ext4_bio_write_page()
Date:   Mon, 06 May 2019 14:42:14 +0530
Organization: IBM
In-Reply-To: <20190501224515.43059-14-ebiggers@kernel.org>
References: <20190501224515.43059-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20190501224515.43059-14-ebiggers@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <5247310.83GBoLVoWW@dhcp-9-109-212-164>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 4:15:15 AM IST Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> As an optimization, don't encrypt blocks fully beyond i_size, since
> those definitely won't need to be written out.  Also add a comment.
> 
> This is in preparation for allowing encryption on ext4 filesystems with
> blocksize != PAGE_SIZE.
> 
> This is based on work by Chandan Rajendra.
>

Looks good to me,

Reviewed-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>

-- 
chandan