Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp6005665ybi; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:14:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwaGoqGucXz84X1ztr3bKxbdx+7EaUPbetEr9dV6mQuugZB+O7y+Zs9FGbYnltSYkSo3qc4 X-Received: by 2002:a63:e70c:: with SMTP id b12mr18244172pgi.242.1560366892014; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:14:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560366892; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vuOSmxjUIhh5x/OWR26UtfzSqO3w0dikZDR7iUloRczXTuX/QYR9vAVGnsXwBxFvBV qwHBLMFSOc9REy96YqetAlZX8gorgxDsNaeqxlnhd+JFEKwRsRn/VXVs0+yc6N8UBSeq sUFn1uL9Mzo3cTBbR7KJKg9TmiBr+MBFCRqrc+uGSE5GLIC5P/EiVJhRMHxowTlGxrpn cP39iW2mkivhI/Xwl4XwI9mAZ7JArt+XEbUKnAGINvauvyDCknDCqfMRAVRcBX4ev3ir WqohF3pfMDM2lJcar3ftUpA0J/SmBjh1o+w0bW3PftAn8vfaoVvsoo+cg4uMi5x5eZsK 4T+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Q6iGM1TiupqbenVhxjWmtAI5HyN33SMdpalMPy6x5OY=; b=OAepsreNIqNAjuT+ambtC160lYapv3Ds9kQoLLOOK5h3r+8nnyLzQpMJqh+d/5wHtz e+HlN0qio9v23G5IzEmP9aNa7dk9q9nu9GJD4zFYfMekTTMiCczf7hEPdcTEIl+TBPwv b4QIVsQoSuQZ4EVkyNHAnRcq7L2oUOZ2Y/+JRFk0+Js7W2n9J5xbc1JckFSjH+Qh3fKa XsgSCn8RHSQYvxfG+MMDO739x1gPjbXx3VoYYknKgT8Bd4kp+oWiApntMROHuEF6CUfq MOyFPMVaoilAGOGs3zDl/xeLix8vtCfaxCcq0hYSJqmqDeSCN7y1C5olM3lICudmZW3x VJRA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=fKZgzRoQ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d23si505820pjw.37.2019.06.12.12.14.30; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=fKZgzRoQ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727855AbfFLTOY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:14:24 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:38169 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727615AbfFLTOY (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:14:24 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id n11so17604551qtl.5 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:14:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Q6iGM1TiupqbenVhxjWmtAI5HyN33SMdpalMPy6x5OY=; b=fKZgzRoQazhx2NyU0bXbVZS8dOqt2ksyWGIauwNWYHJH8kgsCVJI03c4N5lKN0UfbL Bhd0f7dzZ8VYCFXXU+aLJIcr64Q7WMzXQZhTBHMZGz5IhlK3ID/yDJO/l9SrdO5KfgqK Pzqt+w2uTJiIBcYRcbkg+zqo7JEvQt6YgPwzekPufoXbr56qiO4x0n/EncSJ7JDY0Ihx 5v476nbYAMqpu7FcZAOCJM9Yr1cgH62Vahq2y1Hbu0KZAQpHI9vvaxHreBBJ1eHnpDXL 1X7rLB8DRwb8xJ6R2YIgnjubs6XczMXMrodaik5vqBCeF/b9SQjTHUeI0/OO4EIsnzG3 NonA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Q6iGM1TiupqbenVhxjWmtAI5HyN33SMdpalMPy6x5OY=; b=okVWYPO0FkDREZv7QgCK94/oZuEjcbAKpZyyFkM9oZTd12Sqwpspgz1Z/RIedhB589 JfKPLuJYhUinUvqM5nsRKD1NKelvCmrgHhHDMP3lBIRpXQSoj6bO5J4+FIurTUWqvnmu qBgQgl8f8btPlHrIhKzgxhWL2OMjyZo6oZ1s+FmkFHwVs9ml2u7ZMGs0zaU1+8c49BMh 7AERiY3ErT4rF03FNI+6bkmSezUcTvJTqI2tSiOvX+yEcwdxDWlMy5zE9waSLNANYCtW Jn17eEmt3h1/30SJkEsv3El93gs0q/L3mwRMQjwxNtopLFq4UF1GLSkTf8fwzC3vKkCH Sp2w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWSA0Juf75cttd6Ek9zcojh+mjMbjSKmTdyC3Css6uLnXz6jISi SY7XHkt9XI30SaZ7+LpcW3xt0g== X-Received: by 2002:aed:3a03:: with SMTP id n3mr38086132qte.85.1560366863270; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-156-34-55-100.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [156.34.55.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e66sm296313qtb.55.2019.06.12.12.14.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hb8hR-00037z-Na; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:14:21 -0300 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:14:21 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Jan Kara Cc: Ira Weiny , Dan Williams , Theodore Ts'o , Jeff Layton , Dave Chinner , Matthew Wilcox , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , John Hubbard , =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Glisse , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] RDMA/FS DAX truncate proposal Message-ID: <20190612191421.GM3876@ziepe.ca> References: <20190606014544.8339-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20190606104203.GF7433@quack2.suse.cz> <20190606195114.GA30714@ziepe.ca> <20190606222228.GB11698@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20190607103636.GA12765@quack2.suse.cz> <20190607121729.GA14802@ziepe.ca> <20190607145213.GB14559@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20190612102917.GB14578@quack2.suse.cz> <20190612114721.GB3876@ziepe.ca> <20190612120907.GC14578@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190612120907.GC14578@quack2.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:09:07PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 12-06-19 08:47:21, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:29:17PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > > > > The main objection to the current ODP & DAX solution is that very > > > > > little HW can actually implement it, having the alternative still > > > > > require HW support doesn't seem like progress. > > > > > > > > > > I think we will eventually start seein some HW be able to do this > > > > > invalidation, but it won't be universal, and I'd rather leave it > > > > > optional, for recovery from truely catastrophic errors (ie my DAX is > > > > > on fire, I need to unplug it). > > > > > > > > Agreed. I think software wise there is not much some of the devices can do > > > > with such an "invalidate". > > > > > > So out of curiosity: What does RDMA driver do when userspace just closes > > > the file pointing to RDMA object? It has to handle that somehow by aborting > > > everything that's going on... And I wanted similar behavior here. > > > > It aborts *everything* connected to that file descriptor. Destroying > > everything avoids creating inconsistencies that destroying a subset > > would create. > > > > What has been talked about for lease break is not destroying anything > > but very selectively saying that one memory region linked to the GUP > > is no longer functional. > > OK, so what I had in mind was that if RDMA app doesn't play by the rules > and closes the file with existing pins (and thus layout lease) we would > force it to abort everything. Yes, it is disruptive but then the app didn't > obey the rule that it has to maintain file lease while holding pins. Thus > such situation should never happen unless the app is malicious / buggy. We do have the infrastructure to completely revoke the entire *content* of a FD (this is called device disassociate). It is basically close without the app doing close. But again it only works with some drivers. However, this is more likely something a driver could support without a HW change though. It is quite destructive as it forcibly kills everything RDMA related the process(es) are doing, but it is less violent than SIGKILL, and there is perhaps a way for the app to recover from this, if it is coded for it. My preference would be to avoid this scenario, but if it is really necessary, we could probably build it with some work. The only case we use it today is forced HW hot unplug, so it is rarely used and only for an 'emergency' like use case. Jason