Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1622490ybi; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 09:09:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIIHbFucwOiVaWNtJSXQLtxptjRP16ZJoRES9p4NgfUucl4q3PJ23WezNhUVvFNMSg1PHp X-Received: by 2002:a62:1456:: with SMTP id 83mr57969416pfu.228.1560701351093; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 09:09:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560701351; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GRHBIU0RMfJnZuePBZIft9HjGgQghsy7OKa75l/mFus6hHd3lA6S++Aqo/emk+aUsI BF+u5n4ElDbl74lEDyhczBEc0/Yaj6ZfZG37wir3bz0N8JogCDOIQ4vxXTYYCF9eHur+ dcG5aGf/yrlPJZPRZE6pKqvWzpu1I483r+mLHdK4x4Z4GfeOlIsnoDgBix4CExUIQZck nirLPngLoIJDMxb+4+X/m+Vsz7N2hz9ZgKyzzKQo2Nk9fym4LZ/v/bX/D67qse3EZRa+ y0n9cRT2edDD/5vCTtwEh1Sue020N3XojhgFl+WOM58Pqrc4ok0IcTUaJMhSJpHm/Fqb Y4Rw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=RDZ4XRduwq1Jrz5DEfQaS3SBg+g3ILYZdZmC9JSQGm4=; b=MrL5qMSObMyWaMgf2Tdj2qrqHNBc1T1G5nzPoPW8JGsULhofjy/GSsWooN81rZWYXF mADdnNMFUs+sZTDpyLN6/KbG+UNx4BBAtDg2JX3/Z4Plo0+E2IjirLoCaKcrrWUA6NCC jqmbPEJQEyBW/Xthn5mefPqJjPAG36kLJfABdsLnJONmUnK/j7VB3PTv3LYQs0N3wM9F siifA6j2IG7lRsnlMquQdqWJnpm0uNWDYatOFn0LH0udSSosUOQCbDg9gHlhyTEvJUpB ljN+skhxiYfBWuucdMMGCD8Po5mikFq85jr9VnJwOEK3DU2oUfSePBYi9nHLyXLZYP0L 5pdA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 17si8386363pfw.115.2019.06.16.09.08.57; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 09:09:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727406AbfFPQIb (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 16 Jun 2019 12:08:31 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:41786 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727394AbfFPQIb (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jun 2019 12:08:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5GG6T6B091760 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 12:08:30 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2t5dwxpxhw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 12:08:30 -0400 Received: from localhost by e35.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 17:08:29 +0100 Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.18) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sun, 16 Jun 2019 17:08:26 +0100 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5GG8PYa35455322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:08:25 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06076E04E; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:08:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49546E053; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:08:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [9.102.1.181]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:08:21 +0000 (GMT) From: Chandan Rajendra To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Cc: Chandan Rajendra , tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ebiggers@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com, hch@infradead.org Subject: [PATCH V3 7/7] ext4: Enable encryption for subpage-sized blocks Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 21:38:13 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20190616160813.24464-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190616160813.24464-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19061616-0012-0000-0000-00001744B050 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011273; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01218855; UDB=6.00641061; IPR=6.00999987; MB=3.00027334; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-06-16 16:08:29 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19061616-0013-0000-0000-000057B6E856 Message-Id: <20190616160813.24464-8-chandan@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-16_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906160155 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Now that we have the code to support encryption for subpage-sized blocks, this commit removes the conditional check in filesystem mount code. The commit also changes the support statement in Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst to reflect the fact that encryption of filesystems with blocksize less than page size now works. Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra --- Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst | 4 ++-- fs/ext4/super.c | 7 ------- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst index 08c23b60e016..c3efe86bf2b2 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst @@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ Contents encryption ------------------- For file contents, each filesystem block is encrypted independently. -Currently, only the case where the filesystem block size is equal to -the system's page size (usually 4096 bytes) is supported. +Starting from Linux kernel 5.4, encryption of filesystems with block +size less than system's page size is supported. Each block's IV is set to the logical block number within the file as a little endian number, except that: diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index 4079605d437a..63661a86d148 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -4412,13 +4412,6 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) } } - if ((DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED(sbi) || ext4_has_feature_encrypt(sb)) && - (blocksize != PAGE_SIZE)) { - ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, - "Unsupported blocksize for fs encryption"); - goto failed_mount_wq; - } - if (DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED(sbi) && !sb_rdonly(sb) && !ext4_has_feature_encrypt(sb)) { ext4_set_feature_encrypt(sb); -- 2.19.1