Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1821849ybi; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:29:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyy3eiJ7FVXoepEcSE9x4XiCFokUW1urkZhqpBlA3c+bnn03CHtJGaA39RdqOQXd9NzxnpS X-Received: by 2002:a62:b40f:: with SMTP id h15mr121737223pfn.57.1561030177224; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:29:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561030177; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LMwWVccpYyht6ni6U8t29c5/5Fyu0Uc+20DPpAVUO7GfmKqMcrqlHQg0MdupQ3VxNQ ZeZAzhZogIpgmwjlmKIZX9F2zEM3MSTO1e+9ek9xR9sSjrjTH+NiscQnfOwQEEbuNLAC hee2qAMf2Ay/QiN47FEtBHEnTWrJWQ9u5LxtTSIHSEXo1jSaRMJSGLhn7CwxcM/w1yKz TVO6MJmph+VZaJe5/vBuoMvsM1wO5oxDBlDeyTrq3iUsnXWTZXbwqm1PlvgjYmFsBya6 BtBeoCM5XMcr7NDMB/S2+jtPrYJYiJxLm7R6UDlLp/XlMvDZXmglX431oKEsaXcVvMsZ 95Sw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=hZR2EmR3YlisDHpD1diR99wzoWVPTuiYir7pS7ItWvo=; b=nB2aIZmDT/IDw5J5wrouz1vTxPPb/yVAsqQi/4iguuJAgvKoaHCjNFnjFVJS0kRJhP socbxwayIl/js9KmZ5FAA101LvUXScL11TiPw8ZOtZIKa/bUW21BoZ231H8W0T6hMvJ3 B61WVySxRa+ZpKP71RP28KPsYISDpIG61+ElQ31+DGENhhfkly5PJjH8/jhX/nsveWVE 1jZX16c0a+zRyMcccpqQGjhQPoh/8yOS/usI6AFzNhq3Afn0qcVYaGG5uN+93UvGDFZG 45T4r5Rj9VROGIp9hYOc/lEB+3b7TaLoPpcBhtej+LKLqrN4j319o3CV7ZnEIdAbcP9W J1FQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qOtxoFLN; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b5si18626703pfi.205.2019.06.20.04.29.18; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qOtxoFLN; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726592AbfFTL3P (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:29:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:39988 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726491AbfFTL3P (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:29:15 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id p184so1505068pfp.7; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:29:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hZR2EmR3YlisDHpD1diR99wzoWVPTuiYir7pS7ItWvo=; b=qOtxoFLNiOj2LW86NORV5oEeYSLlS+JrDFAJ4//TmGpknvcAMGZmI5WbdvOgqsYPJR OrvSuPi5Fltt+sLSANlrYm/2FA+3lUvIWjmQcumAU16GiF9XeY6P4W4M6s3a26tkvaZQ LHh1W2nN3+RBF7FygSPe6KKeQNBJsXDrQOWIwBFrm7xSzqWjxGrbzl2Epd86OWBHtSlO VMyHI9gJyBtS/yhFhxQfG6weJnZNfTM0rlAMW6H91PorsMXWEvV8MsqJPrNSB+bI2ahC m75G5x+wdbiHyqjd0HKO/Af+0dSmV5bFFeHdwguPB1c2fdsIVsxPWkba//0eM9WDDkeK FKgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hZR2EmR3YlisDHpD1diR99wzoWVPTuiYir7pS7ItWvo=; b=uKn91TpD6YHg3zTrnFd0FvEAIEK+HBzRVi//17QWww7EC1+0hz/iOioWBUucGZPdOJ yEJ7ThhQLX/VmJYQ/APgO8S9Q0kKDTborZqDGeGVPQ0uqRo7kXYC/ESiWHOPWZbN03xu VEpeC6Q/VlEYPCyJvfDNkAweCKnnxcNSpzHI8Qu8h/EWrowXy6W2VF+7sFspzUDo0tX1 /OC/xa7JcLlrM21TbsLdmMcozSI/nEdIf46D11T87QKDaMMwdyLAVd33U8TR2gc3DZ8b qimMP5NbuDwe0JePVdDdmSmdTEmv23+IXJMtM3pFKw2KNo97+PHehwUH0ZKdgFZJ333Q IHGg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVZdBMZI+24WvBCbYUmoQKQ9EhljeE14V/CXqqL26K+YuNteGKK 8BjqeaImFYXG66+HqyM+L2w= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8188:: with SMTP id g8mr77676229pfi.221.1561030154317; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([178.128.102.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a186sm24735797pfa.188.2019.06.20.04.29.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:29:03 +0800 From: Eryu Guan To: Theodore Ts'o Cc: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Lakshmipathi.G" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] shared/012: Add tests for filename casefolding feature Message-ID: <20190620112903.GF15846@desktop> References: <20190612184033.21845-1-krisman@collabora.com> <20190612184033.21845-2-krisman@collabora.com> <20190616144440.GD15846@desktop> <20190616200154.GA7251@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190616200154.GA7251@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 04:01:54PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:44:40PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:40:33PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > > Test looks good to me, and test passes for me with v5.2-rc4 kernel and > > latest e2fsprogs, thanks! Just that, I moved the test to generic, as we > > have all the needed _require rules ready to _notrun on unsupported fs, > > so it's ready to be generic. (Sorry I was not involved with the > > ext4-shared-generic discussion in the first place) > > Just to clear up my confusion, what's the distinction between shared > and generic? Is it that if there are explicit "only run this test on > file systems xxx, yyy, and zzz declarations", then it should be > shared, and otherwise it should be in generic? > > - Ted IMO, shared tests are generic tests that don't have proper _require rules, so they're hard-coded with explicit "_supported_fs xxx yyy". With proper _require rules, there should be no shared tests at all, and we'd try avoid adding new shared tests if possible. Thanks, Eryu