Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 22:53:12 +1000
From:   Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        david@fromorbit.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] ext4: cleanup legacy buffer_head direct IO code
Message-ID: <20190916125312.GC4024@bobrowski>
References: <cover.1568282664.git.mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
 <1d83ac7f8088837064b90cfb3182a37b46356239.1568282664.git.mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
 <20190916120632.GC4005@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190916120632.GC4005@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:06:32AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:05:03PM +1000, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> > Remove buffer_head direct IO code that is now redundant as a result of
> > porting across the read/write paths to use iomap infrastructure.
> 
> I still think moving the removal of the not required code into the
> actual patches that make the code obsolete is a better idea.  That
> makes it very clear what is added to remove what kind and amount of
> old code.

Yeah, you're right, I completely agree with that now that you mention it. I
will do this for the next version of this patch series.

--<M>--