Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp7436758ybp; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:37:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwFJ/F0viT/+2WLN980L4+BZZdUmLv+Ndtdhm77qcUxDVq0c2/jMpcpLMdIr1LWbM3eX7Up X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a986:: with SMTP id jr6mr39759922ejb.158.1571240266885; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:37:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571240266; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qtK3Bid5j98cQTv3Gs5XwxvOJmKFaPL17yQuW8YcxDnsZ4NKxonmmsa/bhsqCmvC51 TNcT+Gt1QJSDjdhodK7O/tMIUTw0q+2DwTU4AyLLfVhYD6pTVktk8Mj6Esdin3hohsd4 Q5mPWfylgRyLezR4P+a4jTQsEMErv3nPwLBP/UgnMKhMkl8D1MPytmNmsG8Lc2RUWLVd AIqRX1f10PkX2f98n+SZNizntJaSv5EvreolmjuGn4PFTl63K2a02OcgXxLl1rKTmlyg xFtXXZAPTsnjFPbnTs0jE2xHP/LVboFOaRpSS7UpuhqU2eZmlfHeiBFDNvKKwO5wG/Os jIqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=mdtkTTLaT8NRuiSlmdvvLJownsmxhDEeLXhT4O2L6sk=; b=0NDpdoBVcGFPRAe9T9xI4W8dOCiTd50+4pN5le78vK4jDGuBjoIu5oL6yZNuCV8Mn+ LYAbA2az+E4yTjoSQ+12lIpa/+9jfam/9COD5afr6/uPNsr92BRHz36n4zOvH64LMxI8 izacWxLlr6C2db4mTUTzKUpJ3++bNBWDt+HbF2YY0M+zfJOnglDqmFOACe7BiUs2speB QIEpo68LQkpqACqhALZ/B/DGYU5P4JeuO6GX3UMaOxbssf8CWMTWYhfdULGdOV7BdKsy MIZYkasJkAi82OFqys8HQ9Jw2hct6njsMZvg75d1T1NZn4T4Mh8IxEV6E5GvDDaAIpwf j7+w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h4si17538944edd.189.2019.10.16.08.37.15; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:37:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728490AbfJPMfS (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:35:18 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:63416 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2393071AbfJPMfR (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:35:17 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9GCRl4C028164 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:35:16 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vp3068xwy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:35:16 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:35:13 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:35:11 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9GCZARi44433520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:35:10 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34023A4068; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:35:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E80DA405C; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:35:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.158.105] (unknown [9.199.158.105]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:35:08 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ext4: Move ext4 bmap to use iomap infrastructure. To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, tytso@mit.edu, mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190820130634.25954-1-riteshh@linux.ibm.com> <20190820130634.25954-2-riteshh@linux.ibm.com> <20191016083108.GA30337@quack2.suse.cz> From: Ritesh Harjani Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:05:07 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191016083108.GA30337@quack2.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19101612-0020-0000-0000-0000037994F9 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19101612-0021-0000-0000-000021CFB900 Message-Id: <20191016123508.5E80DA405C@b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-16_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910160112 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 10/16/19 2:01 PM, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 20-08-19 18:36:33, Ritesh Harjani wrote: >> ext4_iomap_begin is already implemented which provides >> ext4_map_blocks, so just move the API from >> generic_block_bmap to iomap_bmap for iomap conversion. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani > > This seems to have fallen through the cracks. The patch looks OK, feel free > to add: Np. Thanks for the review :) > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara > > Honza > >> --- >> fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c >> index 420fe3deed39..d6a34214e9df 100644 >> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c >> @@ -3355,7 +3355,7 @@ static sector_t ext4_bmap(struct address_space *mapping, sector_t block) >> return 0; >> } >> >> - return generic_block_bmap(mapping, block, ext4_get_block); >> + return iomap_bmap(mapping, block, &ext4_iomap_ops); >> } >> >> static int ext4_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page) >> -- >> 2.21.0 >>