Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp419766ybg; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 23:40:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwgyR0VdzXWVFhAXLwnDgQEuuFRze4BzHDJY2wS7bA2aHaSqjgVyDri3QsUB2/R4fD80LG4 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d304:: with SMTP id p4mr35401170edq.224.1571812836205; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 23:40:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571812836; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BoS3UtBDV0g2Uf+Pg0n+ph7WELwc8OF9lpYaLWPZG5G7yMXJT5sdtMquFU4v69O2GI /xtbExvcRcTN1nt6wS4HNMY41oNqqscegPiumKK6DlzZwtZFotm3pXIKjOWfZ8/m6sLl C6q+yGUd9srqVCJrXuNOjgXHJK7dsYxhmdsABAvLU7dU3eNi97ZtUrD1Td7zXtUa52RT FiNAP5RJRyHI4IoYAzQLVpA9HNEPUGWZprjeYhcKSg3TqKmk9UJjizKMq1eFheOLvbLi PJIdd9OmlYchTSSwB8u8Rd5r6/q//1J/Yt6FTs0tYYwi00oFgGpwQ18d6fVoUQsdW4Dd 8Sqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=ZQS9SY/mE4Oj6d0In+mRNI3XR1wnqFrGMS6VDh69K1U=; b=mVf1OKsI8/dgVuG2EJvsVPsZO0i9W4bmE6aYCZXJPWkzt3YcXyJ9JOF/favGwQmaQH Dl48OsSbNcJEL1UgIysU1UEXoZ+WMqrpxnOkxs2Lt/gNjM7HjkptTTn8xP+TjDubfbdR 8ogx/tsREQFhoVcWLQAhDgt10xsZjgAoHcnoq7pX1RpDjtIrKgQqW2uN9Fv7gHUdRhEW 270Tudw30DXe2T9mhnDL6XVd6xBlKNt0UMydbCyYhjMsFxdy+wyBafwYaMN+kRUoZq46 /TPAYOzGlOMeb7Yx+Qv8VJKxzo1lvxKt/39rpR5bek3RuvVKVJS3mlzXKgNCj9iYqYrb kqdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c27si7126109ede.425.2019.10.22.23.40.11; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 23:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389069AbfJWGjl (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 02:39:41 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:10508 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731961AbfJWGji (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 02:39:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9N6bcWO052231 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 02:39:36 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vteawdb5t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 02:39:35 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:39:33 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:39:29 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9N6dSre52429034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:39:28 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E274C040; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:39:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F6C4C044; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:39:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.158.207] (unknown [9.199.158.207]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:39:25 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT To: Matthew Bobrowski , Jan Kara Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com References: <20191021133715.GD25184@quack2.suse.cz> <20191022015535.GC5092@athena.bobrowski.net> From: Ritesh Harjani Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:09:24 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191022015535.GC5092@athena.bobrowski.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19102306-0012-0000-0000-0000035BE465 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19102306-0013-0000-0000-0000219711A3 Message-Id: <20191023063925.84F6C4C044@d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-23_01:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=832 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910230064 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 10/22/19 7:25 AM, Matthew Bobrowski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:37:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: >> On Mon 21-10-19 20:18:09, Matthew Bobrowski wrote: >> One nit below. >>> + ext4_es_find_extent_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, >>> + map->m_lblk, end, &es); >>> + >>> + if (!es.es_len || es.es_lblk > end) >>> + return false; >>> + >>> + if (es.es_lblk > map->m_lblk) { >>> + map->m_len = es.es_lblk - map->m_lblk; >>> + return false; >>> + } >>> + >>> + if (es.es_lblk <= map->m_lblk) >> >> This condition must be always true AFAICT. > > That would make sense. I will remove this condition in v6. > >>> + offset = map->m_lblk - es.es_lblk; >>> + >>> + map->m_lblk = es.es_lblk + offset; And so, this above line will also be redundant. >>> + map->m_len = es.es_len - offset; >>> + >>> + return true; >>> +} > > ---- >