Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp710186ybx; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 01:25:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxU5P5TAir08CQ7X9sAFCTG8t3Ad5hOFjwdK+9GRFWUCjjI9VL4AeMEOyfZvE+MBQjbf5D9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2061:: with SMTP id qp1mr2051319ejb.43.1573118718460; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 01:25:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573118718; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x0B4WO4bxXpNcUadnxLMUai1Mc8Bxx9d+8ttqm0g81HMvCUBcblOERcudxviVQsVo5 xRM7xCS+B6Pp3/gZItV7bVAgZODNPrCikwME6pnzL2kQz0xapLg0ziSK0OkCwvOgkXw6 vpBzbIiTFxVPI/xcyscHgVDIG/tqVHwqxupBbPHY3E1gAW4OFhgZMaTGKxLxeaYDYFsu oM98ivOQN6n/ejWhWoyVanV3j68VfUiWcIYV84I2mDR8eYL2RX9zqbOvOFF/tf1D2W0U F176pCUeIfmO014VTI6vj9//yGKSD7gGuoOpHrTSVGj1HMXW1VXosy2k55iuG3Bjb10E P4MQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=xgng8r0hbkT4vS8Y9+5bX/K5O16qPdla8DFba+HiZsg=; b=ybN1CAHDkLqTKaCuANR0Kh3Iqeiq7OagDgHL5dASQ6Z0jG9XkHSfsYjU+0Epc0ZK/L gszrt1gPbYCWOVDRzb+JZi9u022loKZHicE0SRFm3g87d7rAv4a3F4vHGz5TLIrPg6EK 96kz2ZXXMqHKTrpS8C2xJ2jAEB01qtE8QxsTrlBgBaVOUdIeJ5TU3renP3yvlKwTqmVr msaEPVbTW+4UDplnhLwTczpOTaUZBPmZS+S9ACDkqF/hg4/6A4D9sSMzZEzljes+0CtP Vf93GZKJbKOWgWagqgTLJHirtQQhelY03zLHWytwA93oz4wCRBgynYwSNGJ1AVZN67Ma zCNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y51si1009927edb.29.2019.11.07.01.24.44; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 01:25:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733297AbfKGJVT (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 04:21:19 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58236 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727408AbfKGJVT (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 04:21:19 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43ACDAC90; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 844341E4415; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:21:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:21:17 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Chengguang Xu Cc: Jan Kara , jack , linux-ext4 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ext2: code cleanup by calling ext2_group_last_block_no() Message-ID: <20191107092117.GA11400@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20191104114036.9893-1-cgxu519@mykernel.net> <20191104114036.9893-2-cgxu519@mykernel.net> <20191106154236.GB12685@quack2.suse.cz> <16e43c91b4e.12c0f5d17918.413402503051848643@mykernel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <16e43c91b4e.12c0f5d17918.413402503051848643@mykernel.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu 07-11-19 10:54:43, Chengguang Xu wrote: > ---- 在 星期三, 2019-11-06 23:42:36 Jan Kara 撰写 ---- > > On Mon 04-11-19 19:40:33, Chengguang Xu wrote: > > > Call common helper ext2_group_last_block_no() to > > > calculate group last block number. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu > > > > Thanks for the patch! I've applied it (as well as 1/5) and added attached > > simplification on top. > > > > In ext2_try_to_allocate() > > + if (my_rsv->_rsv_end < group_last_block) > + end = my_rsv->_rsv_end - group_first_block + 1; > + if (grp_goal < start || grp_goal > end) > > Based on original code, shouldn't it be if (grp_goal < start || grp_goal > >=end) ? Hum, that's a good point. The original code actually had an off-by-one bug because 'end' is really the last block that can be used so grp_goal == end still makes sense. And my cleanup fixed it. Now looking at the code in ext2_try_to_allocate() we also have a similar bug in the loop allocating blocks. There we can also go upto 'end' inclusive. Added a patch to fix that. Thanks for pointing me to this! Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR