Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Phong Tran <tranmanphong@gmail.com>
To:     tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, paulmck@kernel.org,
        joel@joelfernandes.org
Cc:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        rcu@vger.kernel.org, Phong Tran <tranmanphong@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: use rcu API in debug_print_tree
Date:   Sun,  1 Dec 2019 10:51:07 +0700
Message-Id: <20191201035107.24355-1-tranmanphong@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

struct ext4_sb_info.system_blks was marked __rcu.
But access the pointer without using RCU lock and dereference.
Sparse warning with __rcu notation:

block_validity.c:139:29: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
block_validity.c:139:29:    expected struct rb_root const *
block_validity.c:139:29:    got struct rb_root [noderef] <asn:4> *

Signed-off-by: Phong Tran <tranmanphong@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index d4d4fdfac1a6..1ee04e76bbe0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -133,10 +133,13 @@ static void debug_print_tree(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
 {
 	struct rb_node *node;
 	struct ext4_system_zone *entry;
+	struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks;
 	int first = 1;
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "System zones: ");
-	node = rb_first(&sbi->system_blks->root);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->system_blks);
+	node = rb_first(&system_blks->root);
 	while (node) {
 		entry = rb_entry(node, struct ext4_system_zone, node);
 		printk(KERN_CONT "%s%llu-%llu", first ? "" : ", ",
@@ -144,6 +147,7 @@ static void debug_print_tree(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
 		first = 0;
 		node = rb_next(node);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1