Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 08:57:10 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
        Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] fs: Fix page_mkwrite off-by-one errors
Message-ID: <20200108165710.GA18523@infradead.org>
References: <20200108131528.4279-1-agruenba@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200108131528.4279-1-agruenba@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

I don't want to be the party pooper, but shouldn't this be a series
with one patch to add the helper, and then once for each fs / piece
of common code switched over?

On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 02:15:28PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Hi Darrick,
> 
> here's an updated version with the latest feedback incorporated.  Hope
> you find that useful.
> 
> As far as the f2fs merge conflict goes, I've been told by Linus not to
> resolve those kinds of conflicts but to point them out when sending the
> merge request.  So this shouldn't be a big deal.

Also this isn't really the proper way to write a commit message.  This
text would go into the cover letter if it was a series..