Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1144396ybl; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 11:48:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzw6zL001RNMUepDcqAIBva6ImI6dl2it8jSG4hBScrHuAQv+qaxOQL5TXCZDDkg5DSHa93 X-Received: by 2002:aca:503:: with SMTP id 3mr237601oif.106.1578512936745; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 11:48:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578512936; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j7NdYHGldb3oXO6I/t9Z8BNx8P4QPii98eOIgcg86xc/2EtxvWw7h1juRqz5Ua+9dE YEmKbC7UIr0rZKWo4ekdC23wNv9h9n8bXJA8Hwk1jCfn2IbKRFBoEwpcpotrZRbH2Gcj 6HEI6iD+TwpyKCgsqVuhzDdPyVQbgYq0g1ifAQqLTh3fDgD4sxMmxIV3ojppx8S3pYKu a42J953hjA35Fy0+N7wMDlf28LhwoEWXepLb+5uDBK7EqKJZYzjik7YQLYNWv3O9/DGd UcydQtV3io+vxc9K4FxXiAJQ+owi0kWyeLLePH/qbizo81oEm1EA+afv8c+fXO3BGGQr PzWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=tuyYSlHxUy40wKZazP6UBCrQeCO9R0GlxdaWQayqkSw=; b=ePzks3fM+QXIF7WOsEOxhjnXf8iWwktejjMU/AQInoJI62LHH4Fv0Bvek8Z9jSL0Qw MyhZXtBcQ2X5xlwB7UvUdK7+qQ6+toHa1p/k5jSxUWjkJn60ufMsjmPIfX27XLAzIsDN 8ZLg9zdtbxuibFxPljc8hnaxWqHXYx3ocZSXETXSJwnW3tc0dGj7Hbwwu9pCXIhkW3EW hLHxU5DufT9LVIs39ni/8XpYyY0aOOY8aONgAReNgPVce/4TNbZzm7QlYhCBh9bJwaA5 GV5akS7gB1vGorbLl3kHnzhYDEpfFGOOfMuWCN80eHXNJQawNEcOUcmroMaEocSt+rQN ouHw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r4si2353454otq.188.2020.01.08.11.48.42; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 11:48:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727518AbgAHSub (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:50:31 -0500 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:54228 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727326AbgAHSub (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:50:31 -0500 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (guestnat-104-133-0-111.corp.google.com [104.133.0.111] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 008Io5fk020705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:50:06 -0500 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 7075E4207DF; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:50:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:50:05 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Daniel Rosenberg Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Eric Biggers , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Andreas Dilger , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support for Casefolding and Encryption Message-ID: <20200108185005.GE263696@mit.edu> References: <20200107051638.40893-1-drosen@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200107051638.40893-1-drosen@google.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:16:32PM -0800, Daniel Rosenberg wrote: > changes: > fscrypt moved to separate thread to rebase on fscrypt dev branch > addressed feedback, plus some minor fixes What branch was this based on? There is no fscrypt dev branch, so I took the fscrypt master branch, and then applied your fscrypt patches, and then I tried to apply this patch series. I got patch conflicts starting with the very first patch. Applying: TMP: fscrypt: Add support for casefolding with encryption error: patch failed: fs/crypto/Kconfig:9 error: fs/crypto/Kconfig: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/crypto/fname.c:12 error: fs/crypto/fname.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h:12 error: fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/crypto/keysetup.c:192 error: fs/crypto/keysetup.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/crypto/policy.c:67 error: fs/crypto/policy.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/inode.c:20 error: fs/inode.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: include/linux/fscrypt.h:127 error: include/linux/fscrypt.h: patch does not apply Patch failed at 0001 TMP: fscrypt: Add support for casefolding with encryption hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". - Ted