Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1232642ybl; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:25:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwRxoShwp9hrgqLF81by6hLndqZVvArzxh+ZLk/v5tJHO5N2BcEAvq361ywwRCKT0d8BWeN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:683:: with SMTP id k3mr524476oig.50.1578518710191; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:25:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578518710; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WG9JY/MPa3e6SNPdN4ulS74eGRSg21T+Vj4BnL2sEn/bwzMN4+FP0oIPzW5h67piUq 0Sifs/RfaKT5GJOxSeNj7km9kUe6+WNX1HUt6CZYgYPebmnG8HlAnLpNlQ37yKuB8PQq pzR9Di2LO2EQQ8+V4pZibmWvC+lm86vQLuoSYi5Z33OHaUq3W+IfNedMHVmQLcr8vJlr UUj8uzADCtzf9fuIu2wiXfht92OpIgQrHZcfjaov224DL0LR6IgLq5txcJeMUcAmDuwT zChO3BJ0indYeiFF61fdADmweGSWOwpS/8z6vRabZcljKGHJvyNML32sL+m6kn4QnmhE +ZaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=MrgqnfuzWiyeoBisKfI9WUGDpT/I3A3pzpV2omGtkBc=; b=YrqJMlDTccaz1CcRVm2O8Eo9Kio3izBvadAIb6WELqEgvIzLzMfTAkf5b+3Iw6p1xF za1EHknbuDgVng4pqPOOx1Kn9P8GmtZsGPVaKBqFDDptTaVina3CJ8dHs4tbuE03W/9I YX8cW5FXtsqXnkoe1KOf+OKKvX6ormkdjCOcDLfc/kc0r3yq3aAdOhY5hbivV6nY93qZ 2h9bkG+mHx0xoo2R2O8SLozfemNdndzB4CzwNaJnarHq+HkI6q1Lb/k25PVKCokX8Xxr TABSEsF1QYhNZnTjMgbyKpa+UfNZp7fWxECwpofZyrk/kL9wnUulHjBr+QTen3vxguSb FsuQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DDNcIote; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c19si2520760otn.7.2020.01.08.13.24.54; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:25:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DDNcIote; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727437AbgAHVYX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Jan 2020 16:24:23 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:38487 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727429AbgAHVYS (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2020 16:24:18 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id w1so4879344ljh.5 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:24:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MrgqnfuzWiyeoBisKfI9WUGDpT/I3A3pzpV2omGtkBc=; b=DDNcIoteefV8aBFRJqRjAYF8UmeDfEGuxO5aoHpC40ksghWZNn1vYOvHVH75utqX92 8pyR/nWuhn+vomgt79nK/sovZ1x7PhYhTnNXeT0womFAJ98oI98vJEh+zZtrLhhAsaiT xHAeO525OvgTSe1X+L3USeOsbOk+RWWtyuGny4uD91Ul8TIcjfd6L4XmBIrytt5zzyEs hQErb3i2mU9p3strf1rp4eW3q1/1zYZBB0VrVfwfyEPkEBvcTwGsqDvhRh9K2zjsT3ch 4bymw0ydHk1l0bLwoVhIPuVYIxoBXZ9csRffl8URhKARiRZg6AEOEEzGhtohlDS2x0zL xbtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MrgqnfuzWiyeoBisKfI9WUGDpT/I3A3pzpV2omGtkBc=; b=Bd2IjS5cKtHUNQDNbYh2xgDviWlamU2IvopnBBU6+OfR84wVb6MPYDmsVKm25POFv2 ChjOFwTsV2eOEX7qKocA9p/1WBO4fBs22i4KDi+bS9d+gqJdpwyBfeih2hEEf6n6AEZc 2Ub3VRJDErVWpm3Qsj4tmnDkzysvyagVmhRLTNCbpojVijbukMJJ8fmSojSzF+z9gPl8 eBdoR8d0qoQ7ElUPbBIyvIDAPQdWTr/B2EpOYMjffgiZ9qFcUfIsiE1c6e2CHiyOxEhh kdHyEe6okL1CMsXRrT9/nmqivljkSlvxBQkaF3D1auTXV2lvnuc/jFsBZSeLILPHpeQY 7nig== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUTIfCpoH/wCuNeiFjAcfZVpUXQmDF+TcLgoiaI81uIBOT2S/2V 9bts5bi7+AaH1eo3Gns4GF9TIeOVdFj8szRi3TILKje41fs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1049:: with SMTP id x9mr4073045ljm.233.1578518656460; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:24:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200107051638.40893-1-drosen@google.com> <20200108185005.GE263696@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20200108185005.GE263696@mit.edu> From: Daniel Rosenberg Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:24:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support for Casefolding and Encryption To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Eric Biggers , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Andreas Dilger , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , kernel-team@android.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 10:50 AM Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:16:32PM -0800, Daniel Rosenberg wrote: > > changes: > > fscrypt moved to separate thread to rebase on fscrypt dev branch > > addressed feedback, plus some minor fixes > > What branch was this based on? There is no fscrypt dev branch, so I > took the fscrypt master branch, and then applied your fscrypt patches, > and then I tried to apply this patch series. I got patch conflicts > starting with the very first patch. > > Applying: TMP: fscrypt: Add support for casefolding with encryption > error: patch failed: fs/crypto/Kconfig:9 > error: fs/crypto/Kconfig: patch does not apply > error: patch failed: fs/crypto/fname.c:12 > error: fs/crypto/fname.c: patch does not apply > error: patch failed: fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h:12 > error: fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h: patch does not apply > error: patch failed: fs/crypto/keysetup.c:192 > error: fs/crypto/keysetup.c: patch does not apply > error: patch failed: fs/crypto/policy.c:67 > error: fs/crypto/policy.c: patch does not apply > error: patch failed: fs/inode.c:20 > error: fs/inode.c: patch does not apply > error: patch failed: include/linux/fscrypt.h:127 > error: include/linux/fscrypt.h: patch does not apply > Patch failed at 0001 TMP: fscrypt: Add support for casefolding with encryption > hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch > When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". > If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. > To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". > > - Ted > > -- > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com. > This is based off of ToT master. I put in a dummy fscrypt patch so you wouldn't need to rebase on top of fscrypt, but I could just do future patch sets all on top of fscrypt-dev. I guess my attempt to make it easier just made it more confusing :(