Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp5757898ybl; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 14:34:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyF5xSmNHGj/UGVpMwubtUIxczTqnGDRo4BYYdJxaLeNaED4un6XnyZLxy57DG5nVZe5LWs X-Received: by 2002:a9d:22:: with SMTP id 31mr475867ota.173.1579041249716; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 14:34:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579041249; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sn7+k3LdKYKRms7DZ3QA+8jCAp+zB0dthzYszYE1+k9AX+qsgRrKItgrpMQ1AEmn/I EOgv4CAdkK6Nl40bQCXhHaqwdTLQlJhjWgjGhemGrKftseVBxUuaf6UD4G9nwlQlD65r TBOTE/arWZHx4WCeBIF9w5h+4TSjZVaDVEOp/CdEsSf0VlSxsS/Km+VfSc72GgKeuBYs 4aIZ6DMM6+fXFbagHWRygsE3wRUwU7GJFxtHastCIj/kOwtfCIzvP8n46tV+9nOsU5gD Ja7v1Vfcn3VYVTXxwujwdu2AIcp1D2UmBXdchMUChNlBaSOjYuLZLX/cnMz34DOPxYOy 4CJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=NreC1fMhXef2oQlRGI3wkgy2RCLT6Qt5LHRG94rUeb0=; b=miWNkDz8E2tSiWUySmPs0l/dK146r13lbLTixUs6pcZmHbSM5HTsWxz5BsJCZNtm5z GYanPhaOwxpoqTL2irKt06xXcr6jmqxkuGVv0LAr7eKx3Ox6qgmxErXBF5dLdL5amqLp ua7iaJu9RBTKdKngzoZ6O9gyKS+0a1PaNgqjLtAyYj7l+qXEt+QYZ6pKNjTCAzHufocc fTL56iK/HaE4aHvANGzoW/I8xIHkpnOUN7VjIMq300vmt6iQCYvlvr9nyjcYq65TEolp RcT6Z1SrwxpIZGVXp4ExL+WEh64hYRY5PoTfjVw1RrfC+WR50XHJFomWLnhGqSPuV9K+ XqsA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x186si8097421oig.209.2020.01.14.14.33.57; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 14:34:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727073AbgANWd4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:33:56 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:34926 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727072AbgANWd4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:33:56 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00EMWQnp023554 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:33:55 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xh7h7u3s7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:33:55 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:33:54 -0000 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:33:52 -0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00EMX26c34210190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:33:02 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557BEA4093; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:33:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E7DA4094; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:33:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.199.44.28]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:33:49 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] ext4: Fix stale data read exposure problem with DIO read/page_mkwrite To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz, darrick.wong@oracle.com References: <20200114163945.GC7127@infradead.org> From: Ritesh Harjani Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:03:49 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200114163945.GC7127@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20011422-0008-0000-0000-000003496301 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20011422-0009-0000-0000-00004A69B72A Message-Id: <20200114223350.25E7DA4094@d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-14_06:2020-01-14,2020-01-14 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001140173 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 1/14/20 10:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Currently there is a small race window as pointed out by Jan [2] where, when >> ext4 tries to allocate a written block for mapped files and if DIO read is in >> progress, then this may result into stale data read exposure problem. > > Do we have a test case for the problem? I am not very sure if we have it in xfstests, (since I guess, DIO read during mmap writes is not well supported anyways). But sure I was anyway thinking of writing one for my unit testing. Till now I was mainly following that theoretically it is possible, although it may be hard to catch it practically. > Please add at very least the fsdevel and xfs lists to iomap patches. Yes, sorry about that. Will cc' in next time. -ritesh