Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:34:23 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@aol.com>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix race conditions in ->d_compare() and ->d_hash()
Message-ID: <20200124053415.GC31271@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1>
References: <20200124041234.159740-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
 <20200124050423.GA31271@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1>
 <20200124051601.GB832@sol.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200124051601.GB832@sol.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Content-Length: 477
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:16:01PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:

[]

> So we need READ_ONCE() to ensure that a consistent value is used.

By the way, my understanding is all pointer could be accessed
atomicly guaranteed by compiler. In my opinion, we generally
use READ_ONCE() on pointers for other uses (such as, avoid
accessing a variable twice due to compiler optimization and
it will break some logic potentially or need some data
dependency barrier...)

Thanks,
Gao Xiang