Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp6043460ybv; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:47:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzL9wdYXa4Yht5fbGqil1Y3QEq0lRStyA1YLFVesStqq/x+73X7wutgp7WWXizUjFTrWWf8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:9b4:: with SMTP id e20mr1735156oig.37.1582044473622; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:47:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582044473; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZajJtu/6bokqSg88xeWZxKSkEYCA+HXdEAl+E+KeiNbSE3qdc0OWhyF8JxfiWWoHuQ qTkzyZZM7aMEOi5DQaOqQKrX5yEWWs2ThqoD2pVJXYBHRME1F9lYhohXo/Kkszi8a/Fi MFQusO7l75U7wqKbIj3VCPeoe+f4XC4PNAZzClDENQelv/rTCmavk7o8VjxonYn9SaYF NUQaHk02CP4KnRuhIFCGeaPNh6YFZSMBvkgjm4kETmvDDiwTLynUhbsfrbvF/TMmIEzI Mumts3OP08Rcb5bKDJuEm57e/wUYnsVuf6mMeiJwB5LnzXsXDJDQxLRisNseac+fi1/n 4MxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=oU++xgEgeoydjZm/DJFRpsRQXOTb2n7kel9Ots5oXkc=; b=TU5H2dHHnQgPEIGtmOzfvPJ99XyRKLBEj315PLlcIxXwqDo53cbsThbTzGkNHYfxEg gE4cGPf1P0HXfsCEg5V44qOTJQl3/4RMvt22YkXt9qsWvsVR6LGOQBDneMW+PqfqmUex cBnlZcIR5Ao2m8XE9r22bajWeVCCWVUrdGocOI/Fw+EJPl7I+C7RiJwRkWazbyZDZ3eo ft169VtEczbBqCo25ZDWCKxcAE8lYZAwSroQk2gL97+Ql0zpP+G+8osbSiaOUfbCvK3S K5JsQ5c20Kl2IUO1sgp2M2ibFLPDS++w8NhAZbinC1Jq0UZKYvZzOoqVGRB7JhOlQ+aL c+1g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h2si8095240oie.151.2020.02.18.08.47.37; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:47:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726402AbgBRQrT (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:47:19 -0500 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:55451 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726399AbgBRQrT (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:47:19 -0500 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (guestnat-104-133-8-109.corp.google.com [104.133.8.109] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01IGkuZ2010472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:46:57 -0500 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id E4C624211EF; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:46:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:46:55 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Ritesh Harjani Cc: "zhangyi (F)" , jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, luoshijie1@huawei.com, zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] jbd2: do not clear the BH_Mapped flag when forgetting a metadata buffer Message-ID: <20200218164655.GB147128@mit.edu> References: <20200213063821.30455-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> <20200213063821.30455-3-yi.zhang@huawei.com> <20200218051814.854505204E@d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200218051814.854505204E@d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:48:13AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > > Fixes: 904cdbd41d74 ("jbd2: clear dirty flag when revoking a buffer from an older transaction") > > Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) > > This should be a stable candidate I guess. I took care of that before sending a pull request to Linus. :-) - Ted