Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:02:09 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
        ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/19] mm: Put readahead pages in cache earlier
Message-ID: <20200219010209.GI24185@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20200217184613.19668-1-willy@infradead.org>
 <20200217184613.19668-12-willy@infradead.org>
 <e3671faa-dfb3-ceba-3120-a445b2982a95@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e3671faa-dfb3-ceba-3120-a445b2982a95@nvidia.com>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:01:43PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> How about this instead? It uses the "for" loop fully and more naturally,
> and is easier to read. And it does the same thing:
> 
> static inline struct page *readahead_page(struct readahead_control *rac)
> {
> 	struct page *page;
> 
> 	if (!rac->_nr_pages)
> 		return NULL;
> 
> 	page = xa_load(&rac->mapping->i_pages, rac->_start);
> 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
> 	rac->_batch_count = hpage_nr_pages(page);
> 
> 	return page;
> }
> 
> static inline struct page *readahead_next(struct readahead_control *rac)
> {
> 	rac->_nr_pages -= rac->_batch_count;
> 	rac->_start += rac->_batch_count;
> 
> 	return readahead_page(rac);
> }
> 
> #define readahead_for_each(rac, page)			\
> 	for (page = readahead_page(rac); page != NULL;	\
> 	     page = readahead_page(rac))

I'm assuming you mean 'page = readahead_next(rac)' on that second line.

If you keep reading all the way to the penultimate patch, it won't work
for iomap ... at least not in the same way.