Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ext2, possible circular locking dependency detected
To:     Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc:     jack@suse.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20200224130219.GE27857@quack2.suse.cz>
References: <4946.1582339996@jrobl> <20200224090846.GB27857@quack2.suse.cz> <24689.1582538536@jrobl> <20200224130219.GE27857@quack2.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <10328.1582557080.1@jrobl>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:11:20 +0900
Message-ID: <10329.1582557080@jrobl>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Jan Kara:
> OK, in the end I've decided to go with a different solution because I
> realized the warning is a false positive one. The patch has passed a
> fstests run but I'd be grateful if you could verify whether you can no l=
onger
> trigger the lockdep warning. Thanks!

I will.
But it may take very long time, a month or two I am afraid.
If you don't receive any mail about this matter in next few months, then
it means everything is fine.

Thnak you
J. R. Okajima