Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 12:53:42 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
        darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iomap: return partial I/O count on error in
 iomap_dio_bio_actor
Message-ID: <20200225205342.GA12066@infradead.org>
References: <20200220152355.5ticlkptc7kwrifz@fiona>
 <20200221045110.612705204E@d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200221045110.612705204E@d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:21:04AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> >   		if (dio->error) {
> >   			iov_iter_revert(dio->submit.iter, copied);
> > -			copied = ret = 0;
> > +			ret = 0;
> >   			goto out;
> >   		}
> 
> But if I am seeing this correctly, even after there was a dio->error
> if you return copied > 0, then the loop in iomap_dio_rw will continue
> for next iteration as well. Until the second time it won't copy
> anything since dio->error is set and from there I guess it may return
> 0 which will break the loop.

In addition to that copied is also iov_iter_reexpand call.  We don't
really need the re-expand in case of errors, and in fact we also
have the iov_iter_revert call before jumping out, so this will
need a little bit more of an audit and properly documented in the
commit log.

> 
> Is this the correct flow? Shouldn't the while loop doing
> iomap_apply in iomap_dio_rw should also break in case of
> dio->error? Or did I miss anything?

We'd need something there iff we care about a good number of written
in case of the error.  Goldwyn, can you explain what you need this
number for in btrfs?  Maybe with a pointer to the current code base?