Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp2173052ybh; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 00:06:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vstFuwyitG8PPttzbvARPUkY7HRp7+huBaMT/6IbeHg3qK44pwL5KNaYk04TaEGSKqsEgdc X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1c25:: with SMTP id f5mr11798729ote.253.1583737588721; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 00:06:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583737588; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NczfWqw4VETeHU78T9SzGtSYCodvqMstu58nAm5lah9fdCaXMCYME/ngOVAqB8bxnm 4NEFZ29O3qqVmyBeYcu1dt8+s/t8CHOZ41mQJ6s4/BnlQvPMCuopbDJtaJFs1jX9XeQY 5nlL3RE9RVymW1TkOP3h+1TBwhq8zruE5959lJxAqNrOkrA2QaemNR3ZpmMnKcmcboqw AcQsk0go/PRoNbV4PLSCITNlCVd3Bs7sVBqXeWCRClz1hWetVrgaytBgbZpKoYOQ0oOF LOwJhreiOz7HwxNsAl568yM04QeoO9AxGU4rKsWF1t+glCgiFMy4CmUjgZEtUtYQK3Fd WU+w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=BnHLO4H+6JQDCtuWfKSv1caYx5P+bbs9cNSpzL5kh7Y=; b=GHKIXVpp319N2ixBH7vIFUdoVQpphpsBe899JapKNEK8NzbwATT+/B82+KVfpUy2oc 9rhPNj7/jP+JREoQ4DgxzUhEf8seM5WGfj//A1VvwuAx5R/tgWwlWDtqMLHCtJBA/HGo 0eCRQmBcokhDIfehd0N2s4xF8I0NASW1hsEhtT2v9CHWZO3g1ezP0/ibNT64To0qFxz/ e77uuIaj8/i+0Z1jeIR6nYJKiXWuvBgxqTGHX2MWXTiVNCcfSVAsPCp6Mbgqmvur4I7Q sRdrmvVnbLo8DCR/UInJr9PTUmW7SBohEtWlWK9V6gf/VzA0mUwI2ziN+g2CnYi+Qhk3 MuOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="qAwn5/xh"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si5521853otp.189.2020.03.09.00.06.06; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 00:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="qAwn5/xh"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725942AbgCIHF4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 03:05:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:47070 "EHLO mail-pl1-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725796AbgCIHF4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 03:05:56 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id w12so3593973pll.13 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 00:05:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BnHLO4H+6JQDCtuWfKSv1caYx5P+bbs9cNSpzL5kh7Y=; b=qAwn5/xhn1kONlKzn9g/E8v6oP7jSyU01C9nYSHgd8biTgd0e0lfs8DOI1sIqPfNIO KIHmp+759Sm9akhpueFIvxhQcaYU0TwytnZhfVF/lGWZL9m8EMCMCqUBNPiU5jKpg8jV CyMJUbSQ3OV/3/s+lCwjlmyxSoOj6oKcmT5SFyJTb3JTMrGld1tNyWU/mzUFMkMyLhT2 s6+nNxyboMgib94TP79CCtGmBt/au1Ce4jGDPB/oa5fmXlWBj2cjbxx50o/omZlTUWu1 4iTp0p4xU5ycaAU5/f+gDMQevVdGqg7wCFWiTSNGR82Nt5nvuLSPrBxMJr+4/kFXZo31 ZjmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BnHLO4H+6JQDCtuWfKSv1caYx5P+bbs9cNSpzL5kh7Y=; b=AqBMeAfamW8A0+V449fIuQfSz/WJIa0fnA9NcieO5KIdf84zi9sHRb5uR4hm3V+aL9 +izXgJgXs2353SgDgGTewpR+8bOXoD7yiV0QTs8mdj4Ui53CvgDq790VsCYnx3kxlXed 9WrfbntXVw3JpCSjnI0CzjC0KB+oY69bPftkVfOLz8BZZwR2ntd33V5LE0IgMYduwNnW mGGzg4TVrI0Hu4K2+0tqKVzw4sV0g5Avq8DU3o/LDWrURPd6MBpO+7HIfSEBF0MFXyZ6 5LxkfO2Z6MxRkFYs24OwPexXa24vg1APjGTDYeng9th7r21bTG5WWRsMv9zDjGIFW0SZ Gb0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3uuv+Ivf5ZhUY2g0Obk5r2FCZpfNB+v1l7rmaqv40uLSOyNRWl 7cYDOTwFjllcUZ/KiwY3HkE1Z6vO X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1953:: with SMTP id nk19mr16415484pjb.98.1583737554077; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 00:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harshads0.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:2cd:202:ec1e:207a:e951:9a5b]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 8sm3692593pfp.67.2020.03.09.00.05.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 00:05:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Harshad Shirwadkar To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: Harshad Shirwadkar Subject: [PATCH v5 01/20] ext4: update docs for fast commit feature Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 00:05:07 -0700 Message-Id: <20200309070526.218202-1-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org This patch series adds support for fast commits which is a simplified version of the scheme proposed by Park and Shin, in their paper, "iJournaling: Fine-Grained Journaling for Improving the Latency of Fsync System Call"[1]. The basic idea of fast commits is to make JBD2 give the client file system an opportunity to perform a faster commit. Only if the file system cannot perform such a commit operation, then JBD2 should fall back to traditional commits. Because JBD2 operates at block granularity, for every file system metadata update it commits all the changed blocks are written to the journal at commit time. This is inefficient because updates to some blocks that JBD2 commits are derivable from some other blocks. For example, if a new extent is added to an inode, then corresponding updates to the inode table, the block bitmap, the group descriptor and the superblock can be derived based on just the extent information and the corresponding inode information. So, if we take this relationship between blocks into account and replay the journalled blocks smartly, we could increase performance of file system commits significantly. Fast commits introduced in this patch have two main contributions: (1) Making JBD2 fast commit aware, so that clients of JBD2 can implement fast commits (2) Add support in ext4 to use JBD2's new interfaces and implement fast commits. Ext4 supports two modes of fast commits: 1) fast commits with hard consistency guarantees 2) fast commits with soft consistency guarantees When hard consistency is enabled, fast commit guarantees that all the updates will be committed. After a successful replay of fast commits blocks in hard consistency mode, the entire file system would be in the same state as that when fsync() returned before crash. This guarantee is similar to what jbd2 gives with full commits. With soft consistency, file system only guarantees consistency for the inode in question. In this mode, file system will try to write as less data to the backend as possible during the commit time. To be precise, file system records all the data updates for the inode in question and directory updates that are required for guaranteeing consistency of the inode in question. In our evaluations, fast commits with hard consistency performed better than fast commits with soft consistency. That's because with hard consistency, a fast commit often ends up committing other inodes together, while with soft consistency commits get serialized. Future work can look at creating hybrid approach between the two extremes that are there in this patchset. Testing ------- e2fsprogs was updated to set fast commit feature flag and to ignore fast commit blocks during e2fsck. https://github.com/harshadjs/e2fsprogs.git After applying all the patches in this series, following runs of xfstests were performed: - kvm-xfstest.sh -g log -c 4k - kvm-xfstests.sh smoke All the log tests were successful and smoke tests didn't introduce any additional failures. Performance Evaluation ---------------------- Ext4 file system performance was tested with full commits, with fast commits with soft consistency and with fast commits with hard consistency. fs_mark benchmark showed that depending on the file size, performance improvement was seen up to 50%. Soft fast commits performed slightly worse than hard fast commits. But soft fast commits ended up writing slightly lesser number of blocks on disk. Changes since V4: - Rebased on top of v5.6-rc3 - Fixed inode handling due to changed ext4_add_nondir() Harshad Shirwadkar(20): ext4: add debug mount option to test fast commit replay ext4: add fast commit replay path ext4: disable certain features in replay path ext4: add idempotent helpers to manipulate bitmaps ext4: fast commit recovery path preparation jbd2: add fast commit recovery path support ext4: main commit routine for fast commits jbd2: add new APIs for commit path of fast commits ext4: add fast commit on-disk format structs ext4: add fast commit track points ext4: break ext4_unlink() and ext4_link() ext4: add inode tracking and ineligible marking routines ext4: add directory entry tracking routines ext4: add generic diff tracking routines and range tracking jbd2: fast commit main commit path changes jbd2: disable fast commits if journal is empty jbd2: add fast commit block tracker variables ext4, jbd2: add fast commit initialization routines ext4: add handling for extended mount options ext4: update docs for fast commit feature Documentation/filesystems/ext4/journal.rst | 127 ++- Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 18 + fs/ext4/acl.c | 1 + fs/ext4/balloc.c | 10 +- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 126 +++ fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c | 1484 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h | 71 ++ fs/ext4/extents.c | 5 + fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 24 + fs/ext4/fsync.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 165 +++- fs/ext4/inline.c | 3 + fs/ext4/inode.c | 76 +- fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 11 +- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 158 ++- fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 2 + fs/ext4/migrate.c | 1 + fs/ext4/namei.c | 182 ++-- fs/ext4/super.c | 72 +- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 6 + fs/jbd2/commit.c | 61 ++ fs/jbd2/journal.c | 217 +++- fs/jbd2/recovery.c | 67 +- include/linux/jbd2.h | 83 +- include/trace/events/ext4.h | 208 +++- 25 files changed, 3046 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)ˆ Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar --- Documentation/filesystems/ext4/journal.rst | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++- Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 18 +++ 2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/journal.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/journal.rst index ea613ee701f5..f94e66f2f8c4 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/journal.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/journal.rst @@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ safest. If ``data=writeback``, dirty data blocks are not flushed to the disk before the metadata are written to disk through the journal. The journal inode is typically inode 8. The first 68 bytes of the -journal inode are replicated in the ext4 superblock. The journal itself -is normal (but hidden) file within the filesystem. The file usually -consumes an entire block group, though mke2fs tries to put it in the -middle of the disk. +journal inode are replicated in the ext4 superblock. The journal +itself is normal (but hidden) file within the filesystem. The file +usually consumes an entire block group, though mke2fs tries to put it +in the middle of the disk. All fields in jbd2 are written to disk in big-endian order. This is the opposite of ext4. @@ -42,22 +42,74 @@ NOTE: Both ext4 and ocfs2 use jbd2. The maximum size of a journal embedded in an ext4 filesystem is 2^32 blocks. jbd2 itself does not seem to care. +Fast Commits +~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Ext4 also implements fast commits and integrates it with JBD2 journalling. +Fast commits store metadata changes made to the file system as inode level +diff. In other words, each fast commit block identifies updates made to +a particular inode and collectively they represent total changes made to +the file system. + +A fast commit is valid only if there is no full commit after that particular +fast commit. Because of this feature, fast commit blocks can be reused by +the following transactions. + +Each fast commit block stores updates to 1 particular inode. Updates in each +fast commit block are one of the 2 types: +- Data updates (add range / delete range) +- Directory entry updates (Add / remove links) + +Fast commit blocks must be replayed in the order in which they appear on disk. +That's because directory entry updates are written in fast commit blocks +in the order in which they are applied on the file system before crash. +Changing the order of replaying for directory entry updates may result +in inconsistent file system. Note that only directory entry updates need +ordering, data updates, since they apply to only one inode, do not require +ordered replay. Also, fast commits guarantee that file system is in consistent +state after replay of each fast commit block as long as order of replay has +been followed. + +Note that directory inode updates are never directly recorded in fast commits. +Just like other file system level metaata, updates to directories are always +implied based on directory entry updates stored in fast commit blocks. + +Based on which directory entry updates are committed with an inode, fast +commits have two modes of operation: + +- Hard Consistency (default) +- Soft Consistency (can be enabled by setting mount flag "fc_soft_consistency") + +When hard consistency is enabled, fast commit guarantees that all the updates +will be committed. After a successful replay of fast commits blocks +in hard consistency mode, the entire file system would be in the same state as +that when fsync() returned before crash. This guarantee is similar to what +jbd2 gives. + +With soft consistency, file system only guarantees consistency for the +inode in question. In this mode, file system will try to write as less data +to the backed as possible during the commit time. To be precise, file system +records all the data updates for the inode in question and directory updates +that are required for guaranteeing consistency of the inode in question. + Layout ~~~~~~ Generally speaking, the journal has this format: .. list-table:: - :widths: 16 48 16 + :widths: 16 48 16 18 :header-rows: 1 * - Superblock - descriptor\_block (data\_blocks or revocation\_block) [more data or revocations] commmit\_block - [more transactions...] + - [Fast commits...] * - - One transaction - + - Notice that a transaction begins with either a descriptor and some data, or a block revocation list. A finished transaction always ends with a @@ -76,7 +128,7 @@ The journal superblock will be in the next full block after the superblock. .. list-table:: - :widths: 12 12 12 32 12 + :widths: 12 12 12 32 12 12 :header-rows: 1 * - 1024 bytes of padding @@ -85,11 +137,13 @@ superblock. - descriptor\_block (data\_blocks or revocation\_block) [more data or revocations] commmit\_block - [more transactions...] + - [Fast commits...] * - - - - One transaction - + - Block Header ~~~~~~~~~~~~ @@ -609,3 +663,64 @@ bytes long (but uses a full block): - h\_commit\_nsec - Nanoseconds component of the above timestamp. +Fast Commit Block +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +The fast commit block indicates an append to the last commit block +that was written to the journal. One fast commit block records updates +to one inode. So, typically you would find as many fast commit blocks +as the number of inodes that got changed since the last commit. A fast +commit block is valid only if there is no commit block present with +transaction ID greater than that of the fast commit block. If such a +block a present, then there is no need to replay the fast commit +block. + +.. list-table:: + :widths: 8 8 24 40 + :header-rows: 1 + + * - Offset + - Type + - Name + - Descriptor + * - 0x0 + - journal\_header\_s + - (open coded) + - Common block header. + * - 0xC + - \_\_le32 + - fc\_magic + - Magic value which should be set to 0xE2540090. This identifies + that this block is a fast commit block. + * - 0x10 + - \_\_u8 + - fc\_features + - Features used by this fast commit block. + * - 0x11 + - \_\_le16 + - fc_num_tlvs + - Number of TLVs contained in this fast commit block + * - 0x13 + - \_\_le32 + - \_\_fc\_len + - Length of the fast commit block in terms of number of blocks + * - 0x17 + - \_\_le32 + - fc\_ino + - Inode number of the inode that will be recovered using this fast commit + * - 0x2B + - struct ext4\_inode + - inode + - On-disk copy of the inode at the commit time + * - + - struct ext4\_fc\_tl + - Array of struct ext4\_fc\_tl + - The actual delta with the last commit. Starting at this offset, + there is an array of TLVs that indicates which all extents + should be present in the corresponding inode. Currently, + following tags are supported: EXT4\_FC\_TAG\_EXT (extent that + should be present in the inode), EXT4\_FC\_TAG\_HOLE (extent + that should be removed from the inode), EXT4\_FC\_TAG\_ADD\_DENTRY + (dentry that should be linked), EXT4\_FC\_TAG\_DEL\_DENTRY + (dentry that should be unlinked), EXT4\_FC\_TAG\_CREATE\_DENTRY + (dentry that for the file that should be created for the first time). diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst index 58ce6b395206..1cb116ab27ab 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst @@ -115,6 +115,24 @@ called after each transaction commit. You can also use ``transaction->t_private_list`` for attaching entries to a transaction that need processing when the transaction commits. +JBD2 also allows client file systems to implement file system specific +commits which are called as ``fast commits``. Fast commits are +asynchronous in nature i.e. file systems can call their own commit +functions at any time. In order to avoid the race with kjournald +thread and other possible fast commits that may be happening in +parallel, file systems should first call +:c:func:`jbd2_start_async_fc()`. File system can call +:c:func:`jbd2_map_fc_buf()` to get buffers reserved for fast +commits. Once a fast commit is completed, file system should call +:c:func:`jbd2_stop_async_fc()` to indicate and unblock other +committers and the kjournald thread. After performing either a fast +or a full commit, JBD2 calls ``journal->j_fc_cleanup_cb`` to allow +file systems to perform cleanups for their internal fast commit +related data structures. At the replay time, JBD2 passes each and +every fast commit block to the file system via +``journal->j_fc_replay_cb``. Ext4 effectively uses this fast commit +mechanism to improve journal commit performance. + JBD2 also provides a way to block all transaction updates via :c:func:`jbd2_journal_lock_updates()` / :c:func:`jbd2_journal_unlock_updates()`. Ext4 uses this when it wants a -- 2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog