Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158376244589.344135.12925590041630631412.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <20200309200238.GB28467@miu.piliscsaba.redhat.com> <537182.1583794373@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <537182.1583794373@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:18:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJfpegt9TqfyJuk0G-OJdWLiKuxSeY0cQKK=1GVf1fStA9COBw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] VFS: Filesystem information [ver #18]
To:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
        Linux NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:53 PM David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
>
> > >  (1) It can be targetted.  It makes it easy to query directly by path or
> > >      fd, but can also query by mount ID or fscontext fd.  procfs and sysfs
> > >      cannot do three of these things easily.
> >
> > See above: with the addition of open(path, O_PATH) it can do all of these.
>
> That's a horrible interface.  To query a file by path, you have to do:
>
>         fd = open(path, O_PATH);
>         sprintf(procpath, "/proc/self/fdmount/%u/<attr>");
>         fd2 = open(procpath, O_RDONLY);
>         read(fd2, ...);
>         close(fd2);
>         close(fd);
>
> See point (3) about efficiency also.  You're having to open *two* files.

I completely agree, opening two files is surely going to kill
performance of application needing to retrieve a billion mount
attributes per second.</sarcasm>

> > >  (2) Easier to provide LSM oversight.  Is the accessing process allowed to
> > >      query information pertinent to a particular file?
> >
> > Not quite sure why this would be easier for a new ad-hoc interface than for
> > the well established filesystem API.
>
> You're right.  That's why fsinfo() uses standard pathwalk where possible,
> e.g.:
>
>         fsinfo(AT_FDCWD, "/path/to/file", ...);
>
> or a fairly standard fd-querying interface:
>
>         fsinfo(fd, "", { resolve_flags = RESOLVE_EMPTY_PATH },  ...);
>
> to query an open file descriptor.  These are well-established filesystem APIs.

Yes.  The problem is with the "..." part where you pass random
structures to a function.   That's useful sometimes, but at the very
least it breaks type safety, and not what I would call a "clean" API.

> > Now onto the advantages of a filesystem based API:
> >
> >  - immediately usable from all programming languages, including scripts
>
> This is not true.  You can't open O_PATH from shell scripts, so you can't
> query things by path that you can't or shouldn't open (dev file paths, for
> example; symlinks).

Yes.  However, you just wrote the core of a utility that could do this
(in 6 lines, no less).  Now try that feat with fsinfo(2)!

Thanks,
Miklos