Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:52:16 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To:     ira.weiny@intel.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 08/11] fs: Define I_DONTCACNE in VFS layer
Message-ID: <20200415085216.GE501@quack2.suse.cz>
References: <20200415064523.2244712-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20200415064523.2244712-9-ira.weiny@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200415064523.2244712-9-ira.weiny@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

There's a typo in the subject - I_DONTCACNE.

On Tue 14-04-20 23:45:20, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 
> DAX effective mode changes (setting of S_DAX) require inode eviction.
> 
> Define a flag which can be set to inform the VFS layer that inodes
> should not be cached.  This will expedite the eviction of those nodes
> requiring reload.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/fs.h | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index a818ced22961..e2db71d150c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -2151,6 +2151,8 @@ static inline void kiocb_clone(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct kiocb *kiocb_src,
>   *
>   * I_CREATING		New object's inode in the middle of setting up.
>   *
> + * I_DONTCACHE		Do not cache the inode
> + *

Maybe, I'd be more specific here and write: "Evict inode as soon as it is
not used anymore"?

Otherwise the patch looks good to me so feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Also it would be good to CC Al Viro on this one (and the dentry flag) I
guess.

								Honza

>   * Q: What is the difference between I_WILL_FREE and I_FREEING?
>   */
>  #define I_DIRTY_SYNC		(1 << 0)
> @@ -2173,6 +2175,7 @@ static inline void kiocb_clone(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct kiocb *kiocb_src,
>  #define I_WB_SWITCH		(1 << 13)
>  #define I_OVL_INUSE		(1 << 14)
>  #define I_CREATING		(1 << 15)
> +#define I_DONTCACHE		(1 << 16)
>  
>  #define I_DIRTY_INODE (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)
>  #define I_DIRTY (I_DIRTY_INODE | I_DIRTY_PAGES)
> @@ -3042,7 +3045,8 @@ extern int inode_needs_sync(struct inode *inode);
>  extern int generic_delete_inode(struct inode *inode);
>  static inline int generic_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -	return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode);
> +	return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode) ||
> +		(inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE);
>  }
>  
>  extern struct inode *ilookup5_nowait(struct super_block *sb,
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR