Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3506500ybz; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 04:15:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKu8fh28VcfeOifzAzDgo2ZMBV/H17XVcrg4iohkGjIOdbxLaqmeQdwSxzh7EwhpZaGqlC+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7ac8:: with SMTP id k8mr15889181ejo.235.1587381338823; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 04:15:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587381338; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=n5W2Y5SwcKiu9w9JS/UYfq7CB5GO9JMwSUy3tOPikCgYesxVnp+f3tVp2tEbJmgkvG +VFuFQgKjJbE2xyA7J01HJMkpt2WqyWZjb2T4DwrX6pJAa2H6vWj9aTyuVp9Ay/C5XXB HH7B8YwMkuyLRt1tvcCpo5mHURSynWSAqvNj/H42ypGfMVDJcb4TW1obomKev0w/Lruz 7VJ9/i8Iq++9dBgFW+c3/7LQmkP5FDzUkbW7dLCPSxlj2+zi7S1R+cm1V5M/nZU/ryZK qvncE8ZhCh3vbFA6QYSNsgjKclmcK+rmO8jZXpfwWTVJk9qcGqEWJZvhKMjASB5ttXWD 2YvQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=okPBkG9vtS/wVdJh/KDIc+hdg6krV+bND5agW6vUaRM=; b=nFYJELOp7oK97Y/g5W3j+fPjJlhDLLnoCZ8B7KT8HSPdornRzu0jbiWWd0h+GyFp1b 2Ej5fbp7NSjbXtYVPSbXnE5+359w+goELZtDa81tWyeI+CLhrps68IcGUbuiTtkh96np 2N7dmRRPgbEV2e7qDhuYh3zaCeRi0/b1fFW54rYBBW7D9lx7FU8kQKSSkn+KqEws7XwO TFXvBc4B2Qfm0DShjm/20dJ5xytlbpUtyFy2gPg/T2YR6LdzKzks2Vmk8JWTeRcnh08U Hw8MjNaGpm3umEbotLbKPtW+7EdSpKKYkzqmwbZSMEGA8p+Uhi3+iSQ0s4+2XwmY45am VEPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=temperror (no key for signature) header.i=@szeredi.hu header.s=google header.b=IDveWlOS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p9si320106ejf.493.2020.04.20.04.15.04; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 04:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=temperror (no key for signature) header.i=@szeredi.hu header.s=google header.b=IDveWlOS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726201AbgDTLOc (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:14:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47426 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725886AbgDTLOc (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:14:32 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x641.google.com (mail-ej1-x641.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::641]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B0AC061A10 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 04:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x641.google.com with SMTP id e2so5237089eje.13 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 04:14:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=okPBkG9vtS/wVdJh/KDIc+hdg6krV+bND5agW6vUaRM=; b=IDveWlOS7Tzhrdb36+hZpTST6wjOAPrAj2jj5uib3vbWbabqwzW9IWuAtw8h4eTBNA 9a9lkdgEJOm6Eb3fwCtOVTxrVmphaH2PGWy9bhlS9QBo4VsFK/CUgj6vV9uyCovU0arA 5Kj1tMT4D5sNr37XYcPWFQo9UnIzxN1guBg1w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=okPBkG9vtS/wVdJh/KDIc+hdg6krV+bND5agW6vUaRM=; b=WZ4A5YCs1GQz3vwPopmZlIRfXGrebk1jvQK7eoF6uaIUpBPAaehh6Gc5faY+q+f2Fo O/rXl7Cx9vXX+9GR/tDRkhPsPAW/tgaOuHwAa3Qg/201+LEowEr+UpX30U19VOZL/giJ 7zr+LPldWXaqWXU7biVMAD2cK8A1FRdcQfTATp4j82bpgS9PmDvaMcfjMEKvxjw9RziB J8uj3LiME6APQFD9M5ueIqLAwmG9LqUBJ/8hqECnuKfMCw++10UxrCoknZpOW5Gv2/72 6SHTAKvcmqLkPlVHBwBncefAiXdqrcGJNTvtAzELM7hzS8fjOe/NmAMq4zbQp6HnZfoX kNLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubbPABqzKnWTu7dqQQgVBlDELwyoymhKueukyyMAZZ+nVskUmg8 MH8vsoK25YbFT+WY71hRAe1iLwZYG5kntQgMgMMa7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:841a:: with SMTP id n26mr16038100ejx.43.1587381268754; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 04:14:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200414150233.24495-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200414150233.24495-25-willy@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20200414150233.24495-25-willy@infradead.org> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:14:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 24/25] fuse: Convert from readpages to readahead To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-xfs , Dave Chinner , William Kucharski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:08 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" > > Implement the new readahead operation in fuse by using __readahead_batch() > to fill the array of pages in fuse_args_pages directly. This lets us > inline fuse_readpages_fill() into fuse_readahead(). > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) > Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner > Reviewed-by: William Kucharski > --- > fs/fuse/file.c | 99 ++++++++++++++------------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c > index 9d67b830fb7a..db82fb29dd39 100644 > --- a/fs/fuse/file.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c > @@ -915,84 +915,39 @@ static void fuse_send_readpages(struct fuse_io_args *ia, struct file *file) > fuse_readpages_end(fc, &ap->args, err); > } > > -struct fuse_fill_data { > - struct fuse_io_args *ia; > - struct file *file; > - struct inode *inode; > - unsigned int nr_pages; > - unsigned int max_pages; > -}; > - > -static int fuse_readpages_fill(void *_data, struct page *page) > +static void fuse_readahead(struct readahead_control *rac) > { > - struct fuse_fill_data *data = _data; > - struct fuse_io_args *ia = data->ia; > - struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &ia->ap; > - struct inode *inode = data->inode; > + struct inode *inode = rac->mapping->host; > struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode); > + unsigned int i, max_pages, nr_pages = 0; > > - fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, page->index); > - > - if (ap->num_pages && > - (ap->num_pages == fc->max_pages || > - (ap->num_pages + 1) * PAGE_SIZE > fc->max_read || > - ap->pages[ap->num_pages - 1]->index + 1 != page->index)) { > - data->max_pages = min_t(unsigned int, data->nr_pages, > - fc->max_pages); > - fuse_send_readpages(ia, data->file); > - data->ia = ia = fuse_io_alloc(NULL, data->max_pages); > - if (!ia) { > - unlock_page(page); > - return -ENOMEM; > - } > - ap = &ia->ap; > - } > - > - if (WARN_ON(ap->num_pages >= data->max_pages)) { > - unlock_page(page); > - fuse_io_free(ia); > - return -EIO; > - } > - > - get_page(page); > - ap->pages[ap->num_pages] = page; > - ap->descs[ap->num_pages].length = PAGE_SIZE; > - ap->num_pages++; > - data->nr_pages--; > - return 0; > -} > - > -static int fuse_readpages(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, > - struct list_head *pages, unsigned nr_pages) > -{ > - struct inode *inode = mapping->host; > - struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode); > - struct fuse_fill_data data; > - int err; > - > - err = -EIO; > if (is_bad_inode(inode)) > - goto out; > + return; > > - data.file = file; > - data.inode = inode; > - data.nr_pages = nr_pages; > - data.max_pages = min_t(unsigned int, nr_pages, fc->max_pages); > -; > - data.ia = fuse_io_alloc(NULL, data.max_pages); > - err = -ENOMEM; > - if (!data.ia) > - goto out; > + max_pages = min(fc->max_pages, fc->max_read / PAGE_SIZE); > > - err = read_cache_pages(mapping, pages, fuse_readpages_fill, &data); > - if (!err) { > - if (data.ia->ap.num_pages) > - fuse_send_readpages(data.ia, file); > - else > - fuse_io_free(data.ia); > + for (;;) { > + struct fuse_io_args *ia; > + struct fuse_args_pages *ap; > + > + nr_pages = readahead_count(rac) - nr_pages; Hmm. I see what's going on here, but it's confusing. Why is __readahead_batch() decrementing the readahead count at the start, rather than at the end? At the very least it needs a comment about why nr_pages is calculated this way. > + if (nr_pages > max_pages) > + nr_pages = max_pages; > + if (nr_pages == 0) > + break; > + ia = fuse_io_alloc(NULL, nr_pages); > + if (!ia) > + return; > + ap = &ia->ap; > + nr_pages = __readahead_batch(rac, ap->pages, nr_pages); > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) { > + fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, > + readahead_index(rac) + i); What's wrong with ap->pages[i]->index? Are we trying to wean off using ->index? Thanks, Miklos