Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp263035ybz; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:40:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK76iIx/Cxl9QVRkePvGT7758MojA5bQlOA2n4jNPivKdaJAB6v5i2S5Nj6EA5su5Hdg44S X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8609:: with SMTP id o9mr9666227ejx.361.1587768024706; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:40:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587768024; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RrjY5e7lL4cQViilqKVvNfCP4CYAju2hCPRsWOYtlV0I3xStJbTm7FBCEB6A4+TyHr /7hcnW90p4M7Im2pInFu1N5DwSz72kUmaei6PI8OJQRySBHeGOrRMXdnO2Vm2SDEjFu2 q0ztdSYxD8SOrLF6LUgtxg8dSJ2selMvOT2pkpflx9ENqBJBErSQTDl00k6dVoLQv6RN iq+1WWr3lFdTE24+Dp1V7+UNIPTQRlvrpca6po3oRGC/ipAJSVwrCFi27iunSNNKYZns 0gZL4W8Pd5Q9kUL30aSs7AgsEzJzr00G7QGM50f+5ho+wDsTDYbn0Jn480VoOosCOWP2 GhGQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=++NHnt1Xcr0JdGj8NG6WCEFfleaKgmgLKtSUt2yZP1o=; b=vSFygjyXYpexLXpI8itDHKdaQRJZHra7dg/XJnlsc8A6ZGzXLpFYiLzMk4e+H+Adzb vwvMs5Mtd+eaWJ296asQKpkl7DEre2GpCsHlHa2+wwo0bfCB5lCTTl4GHih5C4VBPw8j YqgVteLwtxovA9oyxrWTkiwnXnp+wEu2kkgjITi70ktdOVlb2zBMNG+Ec1SUcjVSMmhy uTKNam11qdyTLUcTY/JKJ04eaoC/vaEDMKy/dqxjLhyXcEGKm++8+m9r9Wf4gWAQVHyr OMtlSAhfTIhFI1CJzvLn5zHU9HVdtf9kVHxjwdpCa9K2YKydD6wdsbV3uXblOi7bARwE PEQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k2si3762238edh.267.2020.04.24.15.39.54; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726031AbgDXWji (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:39:38 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:8086 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725874AbgDXWji (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:39:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03OMWj5i139670; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:39:22 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30k7rnqbee-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:39:21 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 03OMZm80004249; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:39:20 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30fs659mdf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:39:19 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 03OMcAPX60621138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:38:10 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D466B4C05C; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:39:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EB74C059; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:39:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.79.185.245]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:39:15 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iomap: bmap: Remove the WARN and return the proper block address To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Jan Kara , tytso@mit.edu, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: <20200424174815.GF6733@magnolia> From: Ritesh Harjani Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 04:09:14 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200424174815.GF6733@magnolia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20200424223915.D5EB74C059@d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-24_13:2020-04-24,2020-04-24 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004240165 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 4/24/20 11:18 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:52:18PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: >> iomap_bmap() could be called from either of these two paths. >> Either when a user is calling an ioctl_fibmap() interface to get >> the block mapping address or by some filesystem via use of bmap() >> internal kernel API. >> bmap() kernel API is well equipped with handling of u64 addresses. >> >> WARN condition in iomap_bmap_actor() was mainly added to warn all >> the fibmap users. But now that in previous patch we have directly added >> this WARN condition for all fibmap users and also made sure to return 0 >> as block map address in case if addr > INT_MAX. >> So we can now remove this logic from here. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani >> --- >> fs/iomap/fiemap.c | 5 +---- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/iomap/fiemap.c b/fs/iomap/fiemap.c >> index bccf305ea9ce..d55e8f491a5e 100644 >> --- a/fs/iomap/fiemap.c >> +++ b/fs/iomap/fiemap.c >> @@ -117,10 +117,7 @@ iomap_bmap_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, >> >> if (iomap->type == IOMAP_MAPPED) { >> addr = (pos - iomap->offset + iomap->addr) >> inode->i_blkbits; >> - if (addr > INT_MAX) >> - WARN(1, "would truncate bmap result\n"); > > Frankly I would've combined these two patches to make it more obvious > that we're hoisting a FIBMAP constraint check from iomap into the ioctl > handler. Sure, let me combine the two in v2. Thanks!! -ritesh > > --D > >> - else >> - *bno = addr; >> + *bno = addr; >> } >> return 0; >> } >> -- >> 2.21.0 >>