Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp783093ybz; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 04:16:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIWkl5Ubwl9Jdbp4PDYtOhKbi51PqOufGnFBOJpl1yrKyKeyve/kff7uBKsb1txC6c6BUuD X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1c56:: with SMTP id l22mr11412914ejg.304.1587813396559; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 04:16:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587813396; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bFFuGsZgEdSKtqH7wrRE5X6N1T+hA5cwys1L+bX24xecUJMSD4GwxPY1e6Dz+KiTez i1yI+yqt2Zc/gEPfPnkVm2qDoxKLGWs2FEs6HxVyd6l920pdsvCSxZckTqGRv7Ehxwv3 zU2XJmMazI6UQRyIwP1rVZJiZlFiu5p5yA/lXwrb7N7nmA/jLmS/ZIKzn7ZAW/a69FWL F8oS6K704dHdie5C4QkSH+hDbftNsbcJsN+bCW+Qupw0iWhgZqiYpAKAhFD0BDxF/7Nq Qk1MjJgA7MfYgM/JMFm7RyQMB1ZGPZcda52M9jpa5ebUy0orV6Rg6VOmFdOMj2Y6qe0K 696Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=uhHnEJ2o6u08Rl5qZkoTRJHMrjXhcEu88S0lMVOO/nc=; b=Xf7NrPu0Ojp0ia7wVuSUzOZFBXDtmOJgG8q8YifIFOVY71BihfdFN2GXByWEM7xrtS PjJFPbgLskX2RkosQyep9Rff0mx+tuAvb0vbrpPdoQrEIH+8w1UCcLuFuVll8049trDg ao3kX5fwoe9nSoZzLDKepNn4lj+hD3WWBbJs3w0h+T7btJTkxquH0QOBTUC+9cSzhEhy g3Ct65jQ2F5Xi0RGg8pBumHPpMDsYAut0nESI14SUuav2xoSNBVOB9FIi9y4ErLhuVGe c1ImNVtD5ajYafNtVSG69mWVLrRPf91FuOnAu5RWEmPEU/WEvhJ+0RoNHdEtQJnMPLOa C+uQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si4868636edl.93.2020.04.25.04.16.03; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 04:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726151AbgDYLPU (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 07:15:20 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:18378 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726124AbgDYLPT (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 07:15:19 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03PB1RYM058156; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 07:15:06 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mhr3tsyj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 07:15:05 -0400 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 03PBF5D4084488; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 07:15:05 -0400 Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mhr3tsy0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 07:15:05 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 03PBAQqF029811; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:15:02 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30mcu7rdff-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:15:02 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 03PBF0Pe63242294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:15:00 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A5D4C040; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:15:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A484C046; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:14:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.79.185.245]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:14:56 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ext4/overlayfs: fiemap related fixes To: Amir Goldstein , Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ext4 , Jan Kara , Theodore Tso , Andreas Dilger , "Darrick J. Wong" , Alexander Viro , Dan Carpenter , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Murphy Zhou , Miklos Szeredi , linux-fsdevel , overlayfs References: <20200424101153.GC456@infradead.org> <20200424232024.A39974C046@d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20200425094350.GA11881@infradead.org> From: Ritesh Harjani Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 16:44:55 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20200425111456.A2A484C046@d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-25_05:2020-04-24,2020-04-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=947 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004250092 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 4/25/20 4:19 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:43 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:11:59PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: >>> FWIW, I agree with you. >>> And seems like Jan does as well, since he ACKed all your patches. >>> Current patches would be easier to backport to stable kernels. >> >> Honestly, the proper fix is pretty much trivial. I wrote it up this >> morning over coffee: >> >> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/fiemap-fix >> >> Still needs more testing, though. > > Very slick! > > I still think Ritesh's patches are easier for backporting because they are > mostly contained within the ext4/overlayfs subsystems and your patch > can follow up as interface cleanup. > > I would use as generic helper name generic_fiemap_checks() > akin to generic_write_checks() and generic_remap_file_range_prep() => > generic_remap_checks(). If it's ok, I will be happy to do this cleanup in the 2nd round. -ritesh